大反射负载牵引测量系统校准参数优化选取及应用

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2021.07.17

摘要
图/表
参考文献(19)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (2613 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要相对于传统负载牵引测量系统,大反射负载牵引测量系统可以对微波功率放大器件的负载阻抗端实现更大的调配范围,成为目前比较流行的测量方案。对大反射负载牵引测量系统的验证,一般选择转换功率增益作为负载牵引测量系统优化验证参数。通过对比功率增益和转换功率增益的理论值和测量值的偏差,认为在大反射条件下,功率增益对系统校准后的剩余误差更加敏感,对系统准确度优化提升效果更好。最后通过功率优化的应用实验验证,在负载反射系数为0.9时,转换功率增益变化0.4dB,而功率增益变化0.8dB,因此,选取功率增益作为大反射优化校准参数效果更明显,而在小反射系数下可选择转换功率增益作为负载牵引测量系统验证参数。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	张立飞
	杜静
	王一帮
	栾鹏
	吴爱华
	梁法国

关键词 ：计量学, 负载牵引, 功率增益, 微波功率放大器件, 转换功率增益

Abstract：Compared with traditional load-pull measurement systems, the active hybrid load-pull measurement system can achieve a larger load impedance adjustment range for microwave power amplifier device testing, which has become a popular measurement solution.For the verification of active hybrid load-pull measurement system, the transducer gain is generally selected as the optimization verification parameter of the load traction measurement system.By comparing the deviation between the theoretical value and the measured value of the power gain and the transducer gain, it is observed that under large reflection conditions, the power gain is more sensitive for the residual error after system calibration, and the effect of optimizing and improving the system accuracy is better.Finally, it is verified by the application experiment of power optimization, it is observed that when the load reflection coefficient reaches 0.9, the transducer gain changes 0.4dB, whereas the power gain changes 0.8dB.Therefore, the effect of selecting the power gain as a large reflection optimization calibration parameter is more obvious.However, under a small reflection coefficient, the transducer gain can be selected as the verification parameter of the load traction measurement system.

Key words： metrology load-pull power gain microwave power amplifier device transducer gain

收稿日期: 2020-02-25 发布日期: 2021-07-15

PACS:

TB973

基金资助:国家重点仪器研发专项(2016YFF0102105)

作者简介: 张立飞(1986-),女,河北晋州人,中国电子科技集团公司第十三研究所助理工程师,研究方向为无线电计量测试。Email:449083296@qq.com

引用本文:

张立飞,杜静,王一帮,栾鹏,吴爱华,梁法国. 大反射负载牵引测量系统校准参数优化选取及应用[J]. 计量学报, 2021, 42(7): 944-949.
ZHANG Li-fei,DU Jing,WANG Yi-bang,LUAN Peng,WU Ai-hua,LIANG Fa-guo. Selection and Application of Calibration Parameter Optimization for Traction Measurement System with Large Reflective Load. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2021, 42(7): 944-949.

链接本文:

http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2021.07.17 或 http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/CN/Y2021/V42/I7/944

［1］唐宗熙, 李恩. 微波功率固态放大器负载牵引特性的自动测试［J］. 计量学报, 2004, 25 (4): 362-365.
Tang Z X, Li E. Automatic Measurement of Load-pull Property of Power Solid-state Amplifiers at Microwave Frequency ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2004, 25 (4): 362-365.
［2］唐宗熙, 李恩. 一种测量微波功率放大器件输出端反射系数的新方法［J］. 计量学报, 2001, 22 (2): 147-151.
Tang Z X, Li E. A New Method for Measurement of Output Reflection Coefficient of Power Amplifier at Microwave Frequencies ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2001, 22 (2): 147-151.
［3］郑易平. 负载牵引测量技术［J］. 电子测量技术, 2009, 32 (9): 151-155.
Zheng Y P. Load pull measurement technique ［J］. Electronic Measurement Technology, 2009, 32 (9): 151-155.
［4］周春阳. 微波大功率负载牵引测试系统中的Ka波导调配器设计与测试方法研究［D］. 西安:西安电子科技大学, 2014.
［5］任建存, 李香宇, 李廷军, 等. 大功率射频功放中阻抗匹配技术的研究［J］. 仪表技术, 2017, (6): 25-28.
Ren J C, Li X Y, Li T J, et al. Research on Impedance Matching Technology in RF Power Amplifier with High Power ［J］. Instrumentation Technology, 2017, (6): 25-28.
［6］邢靖, 孙卫忠. 基于负载牵引测试系统的功率管参数提取［J］. 微波学报, 2009, 25 (3): 56-59.
Xing J, Sun W Z. Parameters Extraction of Power Tran-sistor Based on Load-Pull Measurement System ［J］. Journal of Microwaves, 2009, 25 (3): 56-59.
［7］汪珍胜, 郑惟彬, 王维波, 等. 负载牵引测试系统的误差源分析［J］. 固体电子学研究与进展, 2015, 35 (6): 560-564.
Wang Z S, Zheng W B, Wang W B, et al. Analysis of Error Source in Load Pull Measurement System ［J］. Research & Progress of Solid State Electronics, 2015, 35 (6): 560-564.
［8］Ferrero A, Teppati V, Carullo A. Accuracy evaluation of on-wafer load-pull measurements ［J］. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory & Techniques, 2001, 49 (1): 39-43.
［9］Sevic J. Basic Verification of Power Loadpull Systems［EB/OL］. Maury Microwave Corporation, 2004.
［10］Focus Microwaves Corporation. Accuracy and Verification of Load-Pull Measurements ［Z］. Application note 18. 1994.
［11］Ferrero A, Teppati V, Carullo A. Accuracy evaluation of on-wafer load-pull measurements ［J］. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 2001, 49 (1): 39-43.
［12］Tsironis C. Active and hybrid harmonic load pull syste-ms: An overview and comparison［C］//Integrated Nonlinear Microwave & Millimetre-wave Circuits. IEEE, 2012.
［13］Gustafsson S, Thorsell M, Fager C. A novel active load-pull system with multi-band capabilities［C］//Microwave Measurement Conference. IEEE, 2013.
［14］Muller J E, Gyselinckx B. Comparison of active versus passive on-wafer load-pull characterisation of microwave and mm-wave power devices［C］//International Microwave Symposium Digest. IEEE, 1994.
［15］M/A-COM Inc. Microwave Power Transistor Impedance Measurement［R］. USA, Application Note 001, 1998.
［16］Focus Microwave Inc. Basics on Load Pull and Noise Measurements［R］. Canada, Application Note 8, 1994.
［17］张杰, 宋振飞, 李君, 等. 基于里德堡原子的微波功率精密测量［J］. 计量学报, 2019, 40 (5): 749-754.
Zhang J, Song Z F, Li J, et al. Precision Measurement of Microwave Power Using Rydberg Atoms ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2019, 40 (5): 749-754.
［18］钟青, 袁文泽, 史艳平, 等. 毫米波功率计量标准器芯片的研制［J］. 计量学报, 2019, 40 (2): 329-332.
Zhong Q, Yuan W Z, Shi Y P, et al. Study on Millimeter Wave Power Standard Devices ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2019, 40 (2): 329-332.
［19］栾鹏, 王一帮, 杜静, 等. 提高大反射负载牵引测量准确度方法研究［J］. 中国测试, 2020, 46 (6): 147-151.
Luan P, Wang Y B, Du J, et al. Research on measuring methods for improving accuracy of large reflective load-pull system ［J］. China Measurement &Test, 2020, 46 (6): 147-151.