Abstract：Apparently, whether local time scale runs good depends on how it is close to international standard time UTC, but it is more important that the consistency of the second definition reproduced by local time scale and by standard time UTC. Based on the concept defined by BIPM about International Atomic Time (TAI) and Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), it is proposed that fractional frequency difference and time stability are the technical criteria to evaluate the local time scale. The argument above is proved by data analysis from six worldwide timekeeping laboratories with fractional frequency difference and time stability, and then this dissertation give some specific analysis about the relationship between each laboratory’s time scale generation program and the two indexes.
黄艳,高源. 本地时标评价方法的研究[J]. 计量学报, 2012, 33(6): 569-571.
HUANG Yan,GAO Yuan. A Study on Evalution of Local Time Scale. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2012, 33(6): 569-571.
［1］BIPM. Le Système International d’Unités, 7th ed. ［M］. France: Bureau International des Poids et Mesures, Sevres,1998.
［2］Guinot B,Thomas C. Establishment of International Atomic Time［R］.Annual Report of the BIPM. Time Section,1988.
［3］BIPM. Circular T a monthly publication of the BIPM, Time, Rerequency and Gravimetry Section, Bureau International des Poids et Mesures,Circular T［EB］.http://www.bipm.org/jsp/en/TimeFtp.jsp?TypePub=publication
［4］Quinn T J. The BIPM and the accurate measurement of time［J］.Proc IEEE, 1991,79(7):894-905.
［5］Piester D, Bauch A, Breakiron L, et al. Time transfer with nanosecond accuracy for the realization of International Atomic Time［J］. Metrologia, 2008, 45(2): 185-198.
2012, Vol. 33 
