陈毅1,王月兵1,费腾1,A. E. Isaev2,A. M. Enyakov2,A. N. Matveev2
1.杭州应用声学研究所, 浙江 富阳 311400
2.Russian National Research Institute for Physicotechnical and Radio Engineering Measurements, Mendeleevo, Moscow Region 141570, Russia
Underwater Acoustics Sound Pressure Calibration Comparison between China and Russia in the Frequency Range 250Hz to 200kHz
CHEN Yi1,WANG Yue-bing1,FEI Teng1,A. E. Isaev2,A. M. Enyakov2,A N. Matveen2
1.Hangzhou Applied Acoustics Research Institute,Fuyang,Zhejiang 311400,China
2.Russian National Research Institute for Physicotechnical and Radio Engineering Measurements, Mendeleevo, Moscow Region 141570, Russia
Abstract：Using B&K 8104 and TC 4033 as standard hydrophones,an underwater acoustics sound pressure calibration comparison in the frequency range 250Hz to 200kHz was carried out between HAARI of China and VNIIFTRI of Russia from September, 2009 to June, 2010. Although the different measurement methods,calibration techniques and measurement facilities were used,the calibration results from both sides were very close,and the maximum deviation was only 0.36 dB. After the discussing and analyzing by the experts from China and Russia,the consensus conclusion was gotten that the measurement methods and calibration techniques using in the comparison calibration are correct,and the results from measurement facilities are accurate and reliable.
陈毅,王月兵,费腾,A. E. Isaev,A. M. Enyakov,A. N. Matveev. 中俄在250 Hz～200 kHz频段的水声声压比对校准[J]. 计量学报, 2012, 33(1): 47-51.
CHEN Yi,WANG Yue-bing,FEI Teng,A. E. Isaev,A. M. Enyakov,A N. Matveen. Underwater Acoustics Sound Pressure Calibration Comparison between China and Russia in the Frequency Range 250Hz to 200kHz. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2012, 33(1): 47-51.
［1］Robinson S P, Harris P M, Ablitt J, et al. An international key comparison of free-field hydrophone calibrations in the frequency range 1 to 500 kHz［J］. J Acoust Soc Am, 2006, 120(3): 1366-1373.
［2］Enyakov A M, Likhatchev S M, Platonov V A, et al. A Russian-Chinese international comparison of hydrophone calibration methods［J］. Metrologia, 1999, 36(4): 297-303.
［3］袁文俊,陈毅,Enyakov A M,等.中俄标准水听器在0.01～1 Hz频段的双边比对校准［J］. 计量学报, 2005, 26(3): 259-262.
［4］Wang Yuebing, Chen Yi, Fei Teng, et al. Report on the COOMET Pilot Comparison 473/RU/09:Calibration of hydrophones in the frequency range from 250 Hz to 200 kHz［R］. CCAUV/10-20, 2010.
［5］International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 60565:2006.Underwater acoustics-Hydrophones-Calibration in the frequency range 0.01 Hz to 1 MHz［S］. 2006.
［6］Isaev A E, Matveev A N. Two approaches to hydrophone free-field calibration at continuous radiation in non-anechoic water tank［J］. Measurement Engineering, 2008, 12: 47-51.
［7］Isaev A E, Matveev A N. Use of a complex moving weighed averaging method for receiver non-uniform frequency response restoration［J］. Acoustical Physics, 2010, 56(5): 693-696.
［8］BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML. Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement［M］. Geneva, Switzerland:International Organization for Standardization, 1995.
2012, Vol. 33 
