坐标测量机面向任务的测量不确定度评定

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2015.06.05

摘要
图/表
参考文献(15)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (841 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要基于产品几何技术规范,分析了坐标测量机面向任务的测量不确定度主要来源;重点讨论了量值特性指标测量复现性的定义与特点,并针对坐标测量机的测量任务,提出引起坐标测量复现性的主要因素,研究了进行复现性指标评价的实验方案,建立了复现性评定的数学模型;通过孔径测量实例分析,介绍了坐标测量机面向任务的测量不确定度评定方法。结果表明,孔径测量结果的合成标准不确定度为3.2 μm,其中测量复现性的不确定度分量高达2.5μm,在测量结果不确定度中所占比重最大。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	陈晓怀
	李红莉
	杨桥
	王汉斌
	程银宝

关键词 ：计量学, 坐标测量机, 面向任务, 产品几何规范, 测量复现性, 不确定度

Abstract：Based on geometrical product specification (GPS) and verification, the main sources of task-oriented measurement uncertainty of coordinate measuring machine (CMM) are analyzed. The definition and characteristics of reproducibility, which is one of CMM quantum property factors, are specially discussed. For the measurement task of CMM, the main factors that might cause measurement reproducibility are proposed, the experimental procedure to evaluate reproducibility value is studied, and the mathematical model for reproducibility evaluation is established. Furthermore, the approach to evaluate task-oriented measurement uncertainty of CMM is provided through an example of circle diameter measurement. The results of the example analysis show that the uncertainty component caused by reproducibility is up to 2.5μm when the combined standard uncertainty of circle diameter measurement is determined to be 3.2μm, and it is accounted for the highest proportion of the result uncertainty.

Key words： metrology; CMM; task-oriented; GPS; reproducibility; uncertainty

收稿日期: 2014-04-23 发布日期: 2015-10-20

PACS:

TB92

基金资助:国家自然科学基金（51275148）; 合肥工业大学青年教师创新项目（2014HGQC0010）

作者简介: 陈晓怀（1954-）,女,合肥工业大学教授、博士生导师,主要研究方向为现代精度理论及应用。

引用本文:

陈晓怀, 李红莉, 杨桥, 王汉斌, 程银宝. 坐标测量机面向任务的测量不确定度评定[J]. 计量学报, 2015, 36(6): 579-583.
CHEN Xiao-huai,LI Hong-li,YANG Qiao,WANG Han-bin,CHENG Yin-bao. Task-oriented Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation of Coordinate Measuring Machine. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2015, 36(6): 579-583.

链接本文:

http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2015.06.05 或 http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/CN/Y2015/V36/I6/579

［1］张国雄. 三坐标测量机［M］.天津:天津大学出版社,1999.
［2］张国雄. 三坐标测量机的发展趋势［J］.中国机械工程, 2000, 11(1):222-226.
［3］Carmignato S, Savio E. Traceable volume measurements using coordinate measuring systems［J］.CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 2011, 60(1):519-522.
［4］国家质量技术监督局计量司. 测量不确定度评定与表示指南［M］.北京:中国计量出版社,2005.
［5］李红莉,陈晓怀,王宏涛. 坐标测量机测量端面距离的不确定度评定［J］.中国机械工程,2012,23(20):2401-2404.
［6］Feng C X, Saal A L, Salsbury J G, et al. Design and analysis of experiments in CMM measurement uncertainty study［J］.Precision Engineering, 2007, 31(2):94-101.
［7］张福民, 曲兴华, 叶声华. 面向对象的大尺寸测量不确定度分析［J］.光学精密工程, 2008, 16（11）:2239-2243.
［8］马修水, 费业泰, 李光, 等. 坐标测量机动态测量不确定度评定研究［J］.仪器仪表学报, 2008, 29（10）:2146-2149.
［9］Jakubiec W, Prowucha W, Starczak M. Analytical estimation of coordinate measurement uncertainty［J］.Measurement, 2012, 45(10):2299-2308.
［10］Sladek J, Gaska A. Evaluation of coordinate measurement uncertainty with use of virtual machine model based on Monte Carlo method ［J］.Measurement, 2012, 45(6):1564-1575.
［11］石照耀, 张宇, 张白. 三坐标机测量齿轮齿廓的不确定度评价［J］.光学精密工程, 2012, 20（4）:766-771.
［12］Shan Wang,Xiaohuai Chen,Qiao Yang. Evaluation of measurement uncertainty based on Bayesian information fusion［C］//Sixth International Symposium on Precision Mechanical Measurements, 2013, 10.
［13］国家质量监督与检验检疫总局. JJF 1059.1—2012 测量不确定度评定与表示［S］.
［14］白旭. 测量系统分析(MSA)在计量工作中的应用［J］.计量与测试技术, 2007, 34（9）:58-59.
［15］Weckenmann A, Knauer M. The Influence of Measurement Strategy on the Uncertainty of CMM Measurements［J］.CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 1998, 47(1): 451-454.