Abstract：To ensure the reliable assessment of laboratory measurement capability,a small scale inter-laboratory comparison was organized. In this comparison the design of scheme arrangement and samples, the distribution testing of data received, the determination of reference values, the performance judgment and analysis of laboratory results were considered. It was also studied on how to reduce the influence of collusion and enhance the scientific rigorousness of inter-laboratory comparison for chemical measurements.
［1］CNAS-CL03:2006,能力验证计划提供者认可准则［S］.
［2］CNAS-GL02:2006,能力验证结果的统计处理和能力评价指南［S］.
［3］陶琳,项海波,许宏民,等.应用稳健统计法对实验室间比对实验结果评价［J］.计量技术,2008,(12):59-62.
［4］全浩,韩永志.标准物质及其应用技术［M］.北京:中国标准出版社,2003.
［5］Thompson M. Uncertainties in concentrations estimated from calibration experiments［R］. AMCTB No 20, 2006.
［6］ISO 13528:2005,Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons［S］.
［7］Thompson M, Ellison S L R, Wood R, et al. The International Harmonized Protocol for the Proficiency Testing of Analytical Chemistry Laboratories［J］. Pure Appl Chem, 2006,78(1):145-196.
2013, Vol. 34 
