Abstract：In order to establish an uncertain analysis and calculation method for the detonation driven model with multiple accumulation functions, a typical cylinder test model was selected for uncertainty analysis. The main factors that affected the measurement uncertainty of various physical quantities mainly included the processes of obtaining original data, fitting displacement curve, calculating expansion velocity and specific kinetic energy. The uncertainty evaluation model of fitting parameters with multiple accumulation functions was modified. At the same time, based on the results of 25mm cylinder test for TNT and JO-159, the variation rule of measurement uncertainty of specific kinetic energy was obtained, and the influences of several factors were analyzed. The results showed that the most important factor that affected the measurement uncertainty of specific kinetic energy of copper pipe was the relative uncertainty of image magnification ratio. With the increase of the specific kinetic energy of copper pipe, the standard uncertainty increased approximately linearly, while the relative uncertainty gradually decreased in the middle and later stages of expansion. For 25mm cylinder test of most high explosive, the relative expanded uncertainty (k=2) of the specific kinetic energy was no more than 2% and became smaller for explosives with higher work capacity.
［1］Itoh S, Suzuki O, Nagano S, et al. Investigations on fundamental properties of underwater shock waves by high speed photography［J］. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 1999, 85(3): 226-230.
［2］李彪彪, 王辉, 沈飞, 等. 壳体对炸药水下爆炸近场特性的影响［J］. 火炸药学报, 2019, 42(1): 58-62.
Li B B, Wang H, Shen F, et al. Effect of shell on short-range characteristics of underwater blast of explosive［J］. Chinese Journal of Explosives and Propellants, 2019, 42(1): 58-62.
［3］郭刘伟, 刘宇思, 汪斌, 等. 高温下TATB基钝感炸药爆轰波波阵面曲率效应实验研究［J］. 含能材料, 2017, 25(2): 138-143.
Guo L W, Liu Y S, Wang B, et al. Front curvature rate stick experiment of TATB based insensitive high explosives at high temperature［J］. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2017, 25(2): 138-143.
［4］沈飞, 王辉, 袁建飞, 等. CL-20基含铝炸药爆轰波阵面法向速度与曲率的关系［J］. 火炸药学报, 2015, 38(1): 8-11.
Shen F, Wang H, Yuan J F, et al. Relationship between normal velocity and curvature of detonation wave front for CL-20-based aluminized explosive［J］. Chinese Journal of Explosives and Propellants, 2015, 38(1): 8-11.
［5］中国人民解放军总装备部. GJB 8381-2015 炸药圆筒试验光学扫描和激光干涉联合测试方法［S］. 北京: 总装备部军标出版发行部, 2015.
［6］Lindsay C M, Butler G C, Rumchik C G, et al. Increasing the utility of the copper cylinder expansion test［J］. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 2010, 35: 433-439.
［7］徐辉, 孙占峰, 李庆忠. 标准圆筒试验数据处理和不确定度评定方法［J］. 北京理工大学学报, 2010, 30(5): 626-630.
Xu H, Sun Z F, Li Q Z. Methods of uncertainty evaluation and data processing of standard cylinder test［J］. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2010, 30(5): 626-630.
［8］资新运, 耿帅, 赵姝帆, 等. 3种亚像素位移测量算法的比较研究［J］. 计量学报, 2015, 36(3): 260-267.
Zi X Y, Geng S, Zhao S F, et al. Comparison of three sub-pixel displacement algorithm［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2015, 36(3): 260-267.
［9］杜亚志, 王学滨, 董伟, 等. 基于一阶及二阶DIC方法的常应变剪切带的测量误差分析［J］. 计量学报, 2018, 39(1): 66-71.
Du Y Z, Wang X B, Dong W, et al. Analyses of measurement errors of shear bands with constant strains based on the one-and two-order DIC methods［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2018, 39(1): 66-71.
［10］费业泰. 误差理论与数据处理［M］. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2012.
［11］方兴华, 宋明顺, 顾龙芳, 等. 基于自适应蒙特卡罗方法的测量不确定度评定［J］. 计量学报, 2016, 37(4): 452-456.
Fang X H, Song M S, Gu L F, et al. Application of adaptive monte carlo method on measurement uncertainty evaluation［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2016, 37(4): 452-456.
［12］江文松, 王中宇, 罗哉, 等. 基于蒙特卡罗法的冲击力溯源系统不确定度评定［J］. 计量学报, 2020, 41(4): 448-454.
Jiang W S, Wang Z Y, Luo Z, et al. Uncertainty Evaluation on the Traceable Measurement System ofthe Impact Force Based on a Monte Carlo Method［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2020, 41(4): 448-454.
［13］孙道安,吕剑,李春迎,等. 热沉定值系统不确定度评定［J］.计量学报, 2021, 42(5): 577-581.
Sun D N,Lü J, Li C Y,et al. The Evaluation of Uncertainty of Valuing System for Heat Sink［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2021, 42(5): 577-581.
［14］国防科学技术工业委员会. GJB 772A-1997炸药试验方法—702.1爆速电测法［S］.
2021, Vol. 42 
