Abstract：A sound field model in the tube was established using COMSOL simulation software for different scales of spherical and cylindrical hydrophones. The interference of different scales of hydrophones on the sound field was analyzed, and the pressure sensitivity of different scales of hydrophones was compensated and corrected accordingly. The hydrophones of different scale were calibrated using a vibrating liquid column calibration device in the frequency band of 100~1000Hz, and the comparison results with the compensated hydrophone sensitivity value indicated that the size of the hydrophone affects the distribution of the surrounding sound field, resulting in uneven distribution of the sound field in the tube. When the size of the sensitive element is close to the inner diameter of the acoustic tube, the interference of the cylindrical hydrophones in the very low frequency band is close to 2.28dB, and the interference in the high frequency band is up to 5dB. And the cylindrical hydrophone of the same size had greater interference to the sound field than the spherical hydrophone. The sensitivity uncertainty of the hydrophone after compensation is within 0.52dB, which meets the requirements of the calibration of the vibrating liquid column method.
SLATER W, CROCKER S, BAKER S. A primary method for the complex calibration of a hydrophone from 1 Hz to 2 kHz ［J］. Metrologia, 2018, 55 (1): 84-94.
CHEN Y, JIA G H, FEI T, et al. The Pilot Comparison Calibration of Vector Receivers in the Frequency Range 5Hz to 10kHz ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2020, 41 (10): 1279-1283.
CHEN Y, JIA G H, FEI T, et al. The Pilot Comparison Calibration of Vector Receivers in the Frequency Range 5 Hz to 10 kHz ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2020, 41 (10): 1279-1283.
CHEN Y, PING Z H, ISAEV A E, et al. Supplementary Comparison of Free-field Hydrophone Calibrations in the Frequency Range 250 Hz to 8 kHz ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2016, 37 (1): 84-89.
TONG H Y, YI Y, LI S, et al. Low-frequency Calibration of Sensitivity of Large-planar Hydrophones in Dynamic Environment ofPressure and Temperature ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2021, 42 (9): 1187-1192.
STRASBERG M, SCHLOSS F. Calibration of pressure gradient transducers in an oscillating liquid column ［J］. J Acous Soc Am, 1973, 54 (2): 553.
［13］
MALARKODI A, LATHA G, SRIDHAR P, et al. Design considerations and establishment of a low frequency hydrophone calibration setup using the principle of vibrating water column ［J］. International Journal of Acoustics and Vibration, 2018, 23 (1): 44-48.
［16］
CUI S, KHOO D W Y. Underwater Calibration of Hydrophones at Very Low Frequencies from 30 Hz to 2 kHz ［J］. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 2018, 1065 (7):072015.
CHEN X, WANG G, YE Z Y, et al. A Review of Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Computational Fluid Dynamics ［J］. Actc Aerodynamica Sinica, 2021, 39 (4):1-13.
［2］
IEC 60565: 2006, Underwater acoustics-Hydrophones-Calibration of hydrophones in the frequency range 0.01Hz to 1MHz ［S］. 2006.
WANG M, YANG P, HE L B, et al. Primary Calibration of Hydrophones in the Frequency Range 10 to 500 kHz Using a Heterodyne Interferometer ［J］. Acta Acustica, 2021, 46 (4): 614-622.
陈毅, 平自红, ISAEV A E, 等. 250Hz~8kHz频率范围水听器自由场校准补充比对 ［J］. 计量学报, 2016, 37 (1): 84-89.
［10］
YI C, ISAEV A E. Comparison of hydrophone calibrations in the frequency range 250 Hz to 200 kHz ［J］. Metrologia, 2011, 48 (1A):09004.
WANG Y B, HUANG Y J. Calibration of Hydrophones Using Optical Technique ［J］. Acta Acustica, 2001, 28 (1): 29-33.
HE S P,TANG W L, LIU T,et al. The Influence of the Wall Thickness and Elasticity of the Underwater Acoustic Tube on the Internal Sound Field ［J］. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2003,7 (5) : 97-103.
2024, Vol. 45 
