Abstract：Aiming at the problem of low calibration efficiency of acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) in water environment, a simultaneous calibration scheme of multiple beams in laboratory pool environment is proposed. The accuracy of the model is verified by establishing an accurate simulation echo model, and the lake test experiment is carried out to verify the accuracy of the model. The echo model is sent back to the laboratory anechoic tank through the transducer, which can realize the simultaneous calibration of multiple ADCP beams, and use the echo model to explore the interference error between beams during calibration. In the bottom tracking calibration mode, the interference error between beams is positively correlated with the bottom velocity. When the velocity is below 1.6m/s, the relative error is below 0.5%. When it exceeds 1.6m/s, the error exceeds the measurement accuracy of the experimental ADCP. The interference error between beams in the water tracking calibration mode exhibits the characteristics of Gaussian noise, and the relative error is concentrated around 0%. The experimental and simulation results prove the feasibility of the simultaneous calibration scheme of multiple beams in ADCP laboratory, and the error can be controlled within the measurement accuracy range after effective shielding.
刘建遥,焦君圣,郭世旭,张纪炜. 基于回波模型仿真的ADCP实验室校准中波束间干扰研究[J]. 计量学报, 2023, 44(12): 1847-1855.
LIU Jian-Yao,JIAO Jun-sheng,GUO Shi-xu,ZHANG Ji-wei. Research on Inter-beam Interference in ADCP Laboratory Calibration Based on Echo Model Simulation. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2023, 44(12): 1847-1855.
Liu Y X. Overview of ADCP technology development and application［J］. Hydrographic Surveying and Charting, 2016, 36(2): 45-49.
［12］
Ma L, Zhang X J, Deng K, et al. An acoustic simulation approach for testing ADCP［C］//IEEE. 2013 OCEANS-San Diego. 2013: 1-4.
Ding Q Z, Jin J Y. Study on the principle of ADCP flow measurement［J］. Computer Era, 2021(3): 14-16, 22.
Li M N, Li C H. Research direction of flow measurement in China based on calibration and measurement capability distribution［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2022, 43(7): 885-891.
［5］
Le Menn M, Morvan S. Velocity calibration of Doppler current profiler transducers［J］. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2020, 8(11): 847.
Zhou Q W, Zhang S, Wang X Y, et al. Detection Method of Acoustic Doppler Profile Flowmeter［J］. Journal of Ocean Technology, 2016, 35(4): 31-35.
Guo Z Y, Liu Y, Hu H M, et al. Calibration method for electromagnetic current meter by hydrostatic drag method［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2021, 42(12): 1604-1610.
Appell G F, Williams R G. Laboratory and field measurements with a Broad Band ADCP［C］//IEEE. Proceedings of OCEANS'93. 1993: II390-II393.
［11］
杨枭杰. 声学多普勒流速剖面仪现场校准装置设计与校准方法研究［D］. 杭州: 中国计量大学.
［13］
Deines K L. Backscatter estimation using broadband acoustic Doppler current profilers［C］//IEEE. Proceedings of the IEEE Sixth Working Conference on Current Measurement (Cat. No. 99CH36331). 1999: 249-253.
［14］
Jackson D R, Baird A M, Crisp J J, et al. High-frequency bottom backscatter measurements in shallow water［J］. The journal of the acoustical society of America, 1986, 80(4): 1188-1199.
［15］
Jackson D R, Winebrenner D P, Ishimaru A. Application of the composite roughness model to high-frequency bottom backscattering［J］. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1986, 79(5): 1410-1422.
［17］
Jackson D, Olson D R. The small-slope approximation for layered, fluid seafloors［J］. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2020, 147(1): 56-73.
［19］
Jackson D. The small-slope approximation for layered seabeds［C］//Acoustical Society of America. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics ICA2013. 2013: 070001.
［21］
Jackson D R, Odom R I, Boyd M L, et al. A geoacoustic bottom interaction model (GABIM)［J］. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 2010, 35(3): 603-617.
［24］
Urick R J. 水声原理(第3版)［M］. 洪申,译. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学出版社, 1990.
Chen X, Liu G, Jiang D L, et al. Research on maritime calibration and parameter setting method of shipborne ADCP［J］. Hydrographic Surveying and Charting, 2022, 42(3): 33-37.
［10］
Harrold M, Bromley P, Broudic M, et al. Assessment of an ADCPs capabilities in laboratory conditions［C］//IEEE. 2015 IEEE/OES Eleveth Current, Waves and Turbulence Measurement (CWTM). 2015: 1-5.
［18］
Thorsos E I, Jackson D R. Thirty years of progress in theory and modeling of sea surface and seabed scattering［C］//American Institute of Physics. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2012, 1495(1): 127-149.
［20］
Williams K L, Jackson D R. Bistatic bottom scattering: Model, experiments, and model/data comparison［J］. The journal of the acoustical society of America, 1998, 103(1): 169-181.
Jackson D, Richardson M. 高频海底声学［M］. 刘保华, 阚光明, 李官保,等译. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2013.
Guo S X, Yang Q J, Wang Y B, et al. On-site calibration method of ADCP flow velocity based on frequency offset response［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2021, 42(1): 53-58.
［16］
Jackson D R, Briggs K B, Williams K L, et al. Tests of models for high-frequency seafloor backscatter［J］. IEEE journal of oceanic engineering, 1996, 21(4): 458-470.
Su S J, Guo X Y, Wang Y K. A simulation method of seafloor reverberation time series［J］. Journal of System Simulation, 2010, 22(8): 1853-1856, 1861.
［23］
Abraham D A, Lyons A P. Exponential scattering and K-distributed reverberation［C］//IEEE. MTS/IEEE Oceans 2001. An Ocean Odyssey. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No. 01CH37295). 2001, 3: 1622-1628.
Yi Z Q, Zhao Z J, Ma X Z, et al. Study on Spherical Scattering Echo Model of Wideband Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2016, 37(6): 610-614.
2023, Vol. 44 
