生物气溶胶采样器采样效率计量评价方法研究进展

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2023.10.19

摘要
图/表
参考文献(40)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (455 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要对生物气溶胶中微生物的采集、种类鉴别与浓度监测是评估生物气溶胶风险性的关键步骤。生物气溶胶采样器对气溶胶中活性微生物粒子的有效采集,是进行气溶胶危险因子分析的前提。有关生物气溶胶采样器采样效率计量评价方法的研究越来越受到计量工作者的重视。因此,通过对生物气溶胶采样器性能、采样物理效率和采样生物效率的不同计量评价方法进行分析和综述,以期为评价方法的规范一致和标准化提供参考。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	刘文成
	傅博强
	刘乃毓
	李曼莉
	牛春艳
	王晶
	伍义行
	李茹
	程环

关键词 ：计量学, 生物气溶胶, 采样器, 采样效率, 计量评价方法

Abstract：The collection, identification and concentration monitoring of microorganisms in bioaerosols are important steps for assessing the risk of bioaerosols. The effective collection of living microbial particles in aerosols by bioaerosol samplers is the precondition for bioaerosol risk factor analysis. Many metrology researchers began to pay more attention to the metrological evaluation methods for bioaerosol sampling efficiency. The different methods for the performance evaluation of sampling physical efficiency and sampling biological efficiency of bioaerosol samplers are reviewed, in order to provide reference for methodological harmonization and standardization of the evaluation method.

Key words： metrology bioaerosol sampler sampling efficiency metrological evaluation methods

收稿日期: 2022-10-19 发布日期: 2023-10-10

PACS:

TB99

基金资助:国家重点研发计划(2018YFC1200500);军事计量项目(202JK22002)

通讯作者: 伍义行(1972-),男,重庆酉阳人,中国计量大学教授,主要从事细胞制剂质量控制、肝脏药理与抗病毒药理方面的研究。Email:yihangwu@cjlu.edu.cn E-mail: fubq@nim.ac.cn

作者简介: 刘文成(1997-),男,安徽滁州人,中国计量大学硕士生,研究方向为细胞计量与标物研制。Email:731901268@qq.com

引用本文:

刘文成,傅博强,刘乃毓,李曼莉,牛春艳,王晶,伍义行,李茹,程环. 生物气溶胶采样器采样效率计量评价方法研究进展[J]. 计量学报, 2023, 44(10): 1617-1625.
LIU Wen-cheng,FU Bo-qiang,LIU Nai-yu,LI Man-li,NIU Chun-yan,WANG Jing,WU Yi-hang,LI Ru,CHENG Huan. Research Progress on Metrological Evaluation Methods for Sampling Efficiency of Bioaerosol Samplers. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2023, 44(10): 1617-1625.

链接本文:

http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2023.10.19 或 http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/CN/Y2023/V44/I10/1617

［7］	倪晓平, 邢玉斌, 索继江, 等. 医疗机构中微生物气溶胶的特性与作用［J］. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2020, 30 (8): 1183-1190.
［23］	张惠力, 甄世祺, 周明浩, 等. 生物气溶胶采样技术研究进展［J］. 环境监测管理与技术, 2011, 23 (4): 18-21.
［4］	常留栓, 李蓉, 李倩, 等. 生物气溶胶采样方法及吸入危害研究进展［J］. 军事医学, 2020, 44 (11): 860-864.
［20］	李涛. 空气微生物采样及发展趋势［J］. 中国卫生检验杂志, 2003, 13 (5): 538-539.
［28］	刘佳琪, 张国城, 吴丹, 等. 安德森六级撞击采样器采集效率评价方法研究［J］. 计量学报, 2022, 43 (6): 825-829.
［31］	杜艳艳, 徐羽贞, 郑超, 等. 新型静电采样器收集酵母菌气溶胶的实验研究［C］//中国物理学会第二十届全国静电学术会议论文集, 2015.
［30］	杨文慧, 温占波, 于龙, 等. 应用气溶胶发生法评价空气微生物采样器采样效率［J］. 中国消毒学杂志, 2009, 26 (3): 245-248.
［36］	郭建树, 程鹏博, 吕蒙, 等. 大流量湿壁气旋式生物气溶胶采样器的设计及其性能评价［J］. 中国消毒学杂志, 2022, 39 (6): 401-406.
［13］	杨柏林, 王晓禹, 李学文, 等. 微生物气溶胶的采集方法及研究进展［J］. 中国消毒学杂志, 2017, 34 (12): 1174-1177.
［1］	Jones R M, Brosseau L M. Aerosol transmission of infectious disease ［J］. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2015, 57 (5): 501-508.
［3］	Tellier R, Li Y, Cowling B J, et al. Recognition of aerosol transmission of infectious agents: a commentary ［J］. BMC infectious diseases, 2019, 19 (1): 1-9.
［17］	Kenny L C. Developments in workplace aerosol sampling. A review ［J］. Analyst, 1996, 121 (9): 1233-1239.
［25］	JJF 1826-2020, 空气微生物采样器校准规范［S］. 2020.
［5］	Gollakota A R K, Gautam S, Santosh M, et al. Bioaerosols: Characterization, pathways, sampling strategies, and challenges to geo-environment and health ［J］. Gondwana Research, 2021, 99 (4): 178-203.
	Ni X P, Xing Y B, Suo J J, et al. Characteristics and effects of microbial aerosols in healthcare settings ［J］. Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology, 2020, 30 (8): 1183-1190.
［8］	Kirtipal N, Bharadwaj S, Kang S G. From SARS to SARS-CoV-2, insights on structure, pathogenicity and immunity aspects of pandemic human coronaviruses ［J］. Infection, Genetics and Evolution, 2020, 85 (4): 1-15.
［9］	Yuen K S, Ye Z W, Fung S Y, et al. SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: The most important research questions ［J］. Cell & bioscience, 2020, 10 (1): 1-5.
	Wu Y, Wang X C, Wang B, et al. Research advances of aerosol sampling technology for airborne influenza virus ［J］. Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology, 2019, 29 (11): 1406-1408.
［11］	Dungan R S, Leytem A B. Recovery of culturable Escherichia coli O157: H7 during operation of a liquid-based bioaerosol sampler ［J］. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2016, 50 (1): 71-75.
［14］	Jensen P A, Todd W F, Davis G N, et al. Evaluation of eight bioaerosol samplers challenged with aerosols of free bacteria ［J］. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 1992, 53 (10): 660-667.
［15］	Mainelis G, Tabayoyong M. The effect of sampling time on the overall performance of portable microbial impactors ［J］. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2010, 44 (1): 75-82.
［2］	Frhlich-Nowoisky J, Kampf C J, Weber B, et al. Bioaerosols in the Earth system: Climate, health, and ecosystem interactions ［J］. Atmospheric Research, 2016, 182 (23): 346-376.
	Chang L S, Li R, Li Q, et al. Sampling methods and inhalation hazards of bioaerosol: research advances ［J］. Military Medical Sciences, 2020, 44 (11): 860-864.
［6］	Després V R, Huffman J A, Burrows S M, et al. Primary biological aerosol particles in the atmosphere: a review ［J］. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 2012, 64 (1): 1-5.
［10］	吴彦, 王旭初, 王兵, 等. 空气中流感病毒气溶胶采样技术研究进展［J］. 中国卫生检验杂志, 2019, 29 (11): 1406-1408.
［12］	Haig C W, Mackay W G, Walker J T, et al. Bioaerosol sampling: sampling mechanisms, bioefficiency and field studies ［J］. Journal of Hospital Infection, 2016, 93 (3): 242-255.
	Yang B L, Wang X Y, Li X W, et al. Collection methods and research advances of microbial aerosols ［J］. Chinese Journal of Disinfection, 2017, 34 (12): 1174-1177.
［18］	Zhou J, Wu J, Zeng X Q, et al. Isolation of H5N6, H7N9 and H9N2 avian influenza A viruses from air sampled at live poultry markets in China, 2014 and 2015［J］. Eurosurveillance, 2016, 21 (35): 1-14.
	Li T. Sampling of microbes in the air and its developing tendency ［J］. Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology, 2003, 13 (5): 538-539.
［26］	GB/T 39990-2021, 颗粒—生物气溶胶采样器—技术条件［S］. 2021.
［16］	Xu Z, Wei K, Wu Y, et al. Enhancing bioaerosol sampling by Andersen impactors using mineral-oil-spread agar plate［J］. PLoS One, 2013, 8 (2): 1-10.
［19］	Blachere F M, Lindsley W G, Slaven J E, et al. Bioaerosol sampling for the detection of aerosolized influenza virus ［J］. Influenza and other respiratory viruses, 2007, 1 (3): 113-120.
［22］	Yao M S, Mainelis G. Utilization of natural electrical charges on airborne microorganisms for their collection by electrostatic means ［J］. Journal of aerosol science, 2006, 37 (4): 513-527.
	Zhang H L, Zhen S Q, Zhou M H, et al. Research Progress on Sampling Technology of Bioaerosol［J］. The Administration and Technique of Environmental Monitoring, 2011, 23 (4): 18-21.
［24］	Haig C W, Mackay W G, Walker J T, et al. Bioaerosol sampling: sampling mechanisms, bioefficiency and field studies ［J］. Journal of Hospital Infection, 2016, 93 (3): 242-255.
［27］	An H R, Mainelis G, Yao M. Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments ［J］. Indoor air, 2004, 14 (6): 385-393.
	Liu J Q, Zhang G C, Wu D, et al. Study on Evaluation Method of Acquisition Efficiency ofAnderson Six-stage lmpact Sampler ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2022, 43 (6): 825-829.
	Du Y Y, Xu Y Z, Zheng C, et al. Experimental Study of C.albicans-aerosols collection with a novel Electrostatic Sampler ［C］. Proceedings of the twentieth National Academic Conference of electrostatic of China Physical Society, China, 2015.
［33］	Dybwad M, Skogan G, Blatny J M. Comparative testing and evaluation of nine different air samplers: end-to-end sampling efficiencies as specific performance measurements for bioaerosol applications ［J］. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2014, 48 (3): 282-295.
［34］	Zhao Y, Aarnink A J A, Doornenbal P, et al. Investigation of the efficiencies of bioaerosol samplers for collecting aerosolized bacteria using a fluorescent tracer. II: sampling efficiency and half-life time ［J］. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2011, 45 (3): 432-442.
［37］	Verreault D, Moineau S, Duchaine C. Methods for sampling of airborne viruses ［J］. Microbiology and molecular biology reviews, 2008, 72 (3): 413-444.
［40］	Pogner C, Konlechner A, Unterwurzacher V, et al. A novel laminar-flow-based bioaerosol test system to determine biological sampling efficiencies of bioaerosol samplers ［J］. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2019, 53 (4): 355-370.
［21］	Zhen S Q, Li K J, Yin L H, et al. A comparison of the efficiencies of a portable BioStage impactor and a Reuter centrifugal sampler (RCS) High Flow for measuring airborne bacteria and fungi concentrations ［J］. Journal of aerosol science, 2009, 40 (6): 503-513.
［29］	Kesavan J, Sagripanti J L. Evaluation criteria for bioaerosol samplers ［J］. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 2015, 17 (3): 638-645.
	Yang W H, Wen Z B, Yu L, et al. Evaluation of the sampling efficiency of bioareosol samplers by the areosol generating method ［J］. Chinese Journal of Disinfection, 2009, 26 (3): 245-248.
	Guo J S, Cheng P B, Lv M, et al. Design and performance of a high flow rate wet wall cyclone bioaerosol sampler［J］. Chinese Journal of Disinfection, 2022, 39 (6): 401-406.
［38］	Tseng C C, Hsiao P K, Chang K C, et al. Optimization of propidium monoazide quantitative PCR for evaluating performances of bioaerosol samplers for sampling airborne Staphylococcus aureus ［J］. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2014, 48 (12): 1308-1319.
［32］	Tolchinsky A D, Sigaev V I, Varfolomeev A N, et al. Performance evaluation of two personal bioaerosol samplers ［J］. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 2011, 46 (14): 1690-1698.
［35］	Han T, Nazarenko Y, Lioy PJ, Mainelis G. Collection efficiencies of an electrostatic sampler with superhydrophobic surface for fungal bioaerosols ［J］. Indoor Air. 2011, 21 (2): 110-120.
［39］	Fittipaldi M, Nocker A, Codony F. Progress in understanding preferential detection of live cells using viability dyes in combination with DNA amplification ［J］. Journal of microbiological methods, 2012, 91 (2): 276-289.