摘要核酸测量在生物安全、医疗健康、食品安全、环境监测等多个领域具有重要应用,因此核酸测量结果的准确和可靠至关重要。核酸计量是关于核酸测量及其应用的学科,是研究核酸计量单位统一和量值准确可靠的生物计量分支。综述了国际化学和生物计量咨询委员会(Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance Metrology in Chemistry and Biology,CCQM)核酸分析工作组(Nucleic Acid Analysis Working Group, NAWG)在提高核酸分析测量结果准确、可靠和可比方面所做的工作。NAWG是一个致力于提高核酸测量结果可比性的国际组织,其主要工作是为核酸测量能力的维持与发展提供支持。近20年来,NAWG成员开展了一系列研究工作,为不同领域的核酸测量结果的准确、一致和可溯源提供了支持。
Abstract：Nucleic acid measurement has been widely used in biosafety, medical health, food safety, environmental monitoring and other fields. Thus, the accuracy and reliability of nucleic acid measurement is crucial. Nucleic acid metrology is a subject about nucleic acid measurement and its application. It is a biometric branch that studies the unity of nucleic acid measurement units and accurate and reliable quantity values. The work done by the Nuclear Acid Analysis Working Group (NAWG) of the Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance Metrology in Chemistry and Biology (CCQM) in improving the accuracy, reliability and comparability of nucleic acid analysis and measurement results is summarized. The NAWG is an international group dedicated to improving the global comparability of nucleic acid measurements; its primary focus is to support the development and maintenance of measurement capabilities. For nearly two decades, NAWG members have conducted a series of research efforts that support reliable, consistent and traceable nucleic acid measurements in various fields.
杨佳怡,牛春艳,高运华,董莲华. 核酸分析工作组——有效推进核酸测量结果准确一致与可溯源[J]. 计量学报, 2023, 44(3): 488-494.
YANG Jia-yi,NIU Chun-yan,GAO Yun-hua,DONG Lian-hua. Center for Advanced Measurement Science, National Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029, China. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2023, 44(3): 488-494.
Stark R, Grzelak M, Hadfield J. RNA sequencing: the teenage years ［J］. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2019, 20: 631-454.
［2］
Schadt E E, Turner S, Kasarskis A. A window into third-generation sequencing. ［J］. Human Molecular Genetics, 2010, 19: 227-240.
［3］
Heather J M, Chain B. The sequence of sequencers: The history of sequencing DNA ［J］. Genomics, 2016, 107: 1-8.
［11］
International Organization for Standardization［EB/OL］. https: //www.iso.org/home.html.
［12］
World Health Organisation［EB/OL］https: //www.who.int/.
［14］
International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine［EB/OL］. ［2022-12-31］https: //www.ifcc.org.
［17］
CCQM Working Group on Nucleic Acid Analysis (CCQM-NAWG) ［EB/OL］. ［2022-12-31］https: //www.bipm.org/en/committees/cc/ccqm/wg/ccqm-nawg.
［5］
Tanaskovski B, Broothaerts W, Buttinger G, et al. Determination of GM Maize MON88017 in Bird Feed and GM Maize GA21 in Maize Flour : EURL GMFF Proficiency Testing Report GMFF-20/01［R］.2020.
［6］
Wim B, Hakan E. Determination of GM Soybean 40-3-2 in Chicken Feed and Soybean Flour:EURL GMFF Proficiency Test Report CT 02/17 ［R］. 2017.
［7］
Barbi M, MacKay W G, Binda S, et al. External quality assessment of cytomegalovirus DNA detection on dried blood spots ［J］.BMC Microbiol, 2008,8(1): 2.
［15］
European Network of GMO Laboratories (ENGL) ［EB/OL］. ［2022-12-31］https: //gmo-487 crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ENGL/ENGL.html.
［18］
Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance: Metrology in Chemistry and Biology (CCQM)［EB/OL］.［2022-12-31］https: //www.bipm.org/en/committees/cc/ccqm/
Kaarls R. The Consultative Committee for Metrology in Chemistry and Biology-CCQM. ［J］. Chem Metrol, 2018, 12: 1-16.
［4］
Morley A A. Digital PCR: A brief history ［J］. Biomolecular Detection and Quantification, 2014, 1 (1): 1-2.
Niu C Y, Zhang Y Z, Yang J Y, et al.Resrach on the Collaborative Value Assignment of Plasmid Nucleic Acid Refernce Materials Based on Digital PCR［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2021, 42(11): 1522-1527.
［9］
Hayes D F. Precision Medicine and Testing for Tumor Biomarkers—Are All Tests Born Equal ［J］. JAMA Oncol, 2018, 4 (6): 773-774.
［13］
The Joint Committee for Traceability in Laboratory Medicine (JCTLM) ［EB/OL］. ［2022-12-31］https: //www.jctlm.org/.
［22］
Camloh M, Dreo T, Gruden K, et al. Nucleic-acid analysis in new fields of metrology［C］//National Institute of Biology. 17th Int Congr Metrol CIM.Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2015: 1-5.
CIPM Calibration and measurement capabilities in the context of the CIPM MRA: CIPM MRA-D-04［R］.2017.
［27］
Lee S B, Crouse C A, Kline M C. Optimizing Storage and Handling of DNA Extracts ［J］. Forensic Science Review, 2010, 22 (2): 131-144.
［28］
Bogoalec Kosˇir A, Divieto C, Pavsˇicˇ J, et al. Droplet volume variability as a critical factor for accuracy of absolute quantification using droplet digital PCR ［J］. Analytical And Bioanalytical Chemistry , 2017, 409: 6689-6697.
［29］
Dagata J A, Farkas N, Kramer J A. Method for Measuring the Volume of Nominally 100μm Diameter Spherical Water-in-Oil Emulsion Droplets: NIST.SP.260-184 ［R］. 2016.
［31］
Corbisier P, Pinheiro L, Mazoua S, et al. DNA copy number concentration measured by digital and droplet digital quantitative PCR using certified reference materials ［J］. Analytical And Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2015, 407: 1831-40.
［32］
Yoo H-B, Park S-R, Dong L, et al. International Comparison of Enumeration-Based Quantification of DNA Copy-Concentration Using Flow Cytometric Counting and Digital Polymerase Chain Reactionv［J］.Analytical Chemistry, 2016, 88: 12169-12176.
［33］
Huggett J F, Foy C A, Benes V, et al. The digital MIQE guidelines: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Digital PCR Experiments ［J］. Clin Chem, 2013, 59: 892-902.
［35］
el J, Milavec M, Morisset D, et al. How to reliably test for GMOs［M］. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2012.
［49］
Metrology in the fight against Covid-19-Contributions from NMIs. ［EB/OL］.［2022-12-31］https: //www.bipm.org/en/metrology-in-the-fight-against-covid-19.
Torga G, Pienta K J. Patient-Paired Sample Congruence Between 2 Commercial Liquid Biopsy Tests ［J］. JAMA Oncology, 2018, 4 (6): 868-870.
［20］
General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM)［EB/OL］. ［2022-12-31］ https: //www.bipm.org/en/committees/cg/cgpm.
［30］
Pinheiro L B, Coleman V A, Hindson C M, et al. Evaluation of a droplet digital polymerase chain reaction format for DNA copy number quantification ［J］. Analytical Chemistry, 2012, 84: 1003-11.
［39］
Mester Z, Corbisier P, Ellison S L R, et al. Final report of CCQM-K86.c. Relative quantification of genomic DNA fragments extracted from a biological tissue ［J］. Metrologia, 2020, 57(1A): 08004.
［40］
Baker S C, Bauer S R, Beyer R P, et al. The External RNA Controls Consortium: a progress report ［J］. Nature Methods, 2005, 2(10): 731-734.
［43］
Haq R , Shoag J , Andreu-Perez P , et al. Oncogenic BRAF regulates oxidative metabolism via PGC1alpha and MITF ［J］. Cancer Cell, 2013, 23 (3): 302-315.
［45］
Falak S, Macdonald R, Busby E J, et al. An assessment of the reproducibility of reverse transcription digital PCR quantification of HIV-1 ［J］. Methods, 2022, 201:34-40.
［50］
Yoo H M, Kim I H, Kim S.Nucleic Acid Testing of SARS-CoV-2 ［J］. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021, 22: 6150.
［54］
Ahmad-Nejad P, Ashavaid T, Vacaflores Salinas A, et al. Current and future challenges in quality assurance in molecular diagnostics ［J］. Clinica Chimica Acta, 2021, 519: 239-246.
Zhang Y Z,Gao Y, Niu C Y, et al. Status and Prospects on the Standardization of Biological Phenotype and Phenome［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2022, 43(10): 1382-1388.
［16］
Codex Alimentarius International Food Standards［EB/OL］. ［2022-12-31］http: //www.fao.org/fao-who-489 codexalimentarius/en/.
［26］
Baoutina A, Bhat S, Partis L, et al. Storage Stability of Solutions of DNA Standards ［J］. Analytical Chemistry, 2019, 91 (19): 12268-12274 .
［36］
Milavec M, Dobnik D, et al. GMO quantification: Valuable experience and insights for the future ［J］. Analytical And Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2014, 406: 6485-6497.
［46］
National Measurement Institutes demonstrate high accuracy reference measurement system for SARS-CoV-2 testing［EB/OL］.［2021-06-20］https: //www.bipm.org/en//-/2020-nmi-covid .
［55］
Karimian A, Azizian K, Parsian H, et al. CRISPR/Cas9 technology as a potent molecular tool for gene therapy ［J］. Cell Physiol, 2019, 234: 12267-12277.
［24］
BIPM. Calibration and Measurement Capabilities in the context of the CIPM MRA: report of National Metrology Institutes［R］.2013.
［34］
Huggett J F, Whale A S, De Spiegelaere W, et al. The Digital MIQE Guidelines Update: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Digital PCR Experiments for 2020 ［J］. Clin Chem, 2020, 66: 1012-1029.
［44］
Dong M K, Shichen Z, Minhee K, et al. Fluorometric Detection of Low-Abundance EGFR Exon 19 Deletion Mutation Using Tandem Gene Amplification ［J］. Journal of microbiology and biotechnology, 2020, 30 (5): 662-667.
［53］
Metrology in Chemistry and Biology. CCQM strategy document 2021—2030［M］.Version 1.0. Pavillon de Breteuil,2021.
［37］
Corbisier P, Vincent S, Schimmel H, et al. CCQM-K86/P113.1: Relative quantification of genomic DNA fragments extracted from a biological tissue ［J］. Metrologia, 2012, 49(1A): 08002.
［38］
Dong L H, Sui Z W, Wang J, et al. Final report for CCQM-K86.b Relative quantification of Bt63 in GM rice matrix sample［J］.Metrologia, 2018 55(1A): 08017.
［41］
Devonshire A S, Sanders R, Whale A S, et al. An international comparability study on quantification of mRNA gene expression ratios: CCQM-P103.1 ［J］. Biomol Detect Quantif , 2016, 8: 15-28.
［42］
Yi J , Ren L , Li D , et al. Trefoil factor 1 (TFF1) is a potential prognostic biomarker with functional significance in breast cancersv［J］. Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy , 2020, 124 (2): 109827.
［47］
BIPM. Measurement comparisons in the CIPM MRA［M］. Version 1.1. Bureau International des Poids et Mesures BIPM-Pavillon de Breteuil, 2021.
National Institute of Metrology. NIM to provide urgently needed 2019-nCoV RNA certified reference materials［EB/OL］. ［2023-02-09］https://en.nim.ac.cn/node/657.
［52］
The National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC). COVID-19-related research reagents［EB/OL］.［2022-12-31］
［56］
OSullivan D M, Doyle R M, Temisak S, et al. An inter-laboratory study to investigate the impact of the bioinformatics component on microbiome analysis using mock communities ［J］. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11: 10590.
2023, Vol. 44 
