基于改进蝠鲼优化算法的光伏组件参数辨识模型

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2023.01.16

摘要
图/表
参考文献(24)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (2610 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要为了解决当前光伏组件模型中存在的参数辨识精度低和稳定性差的问题,提出了一种基于折射学习机制的蝠鲼觅食优化算法的三二极管光伏组件参数辨识模型(RLMRFO-TDM)。该模型将差分进化机制融入到MRFO算法的种群更新环节,提高了MRFO算法的局部探索能力,并加快了MRFO算法收敛速度;引入折射学习机制改善了MRFO算法的随机性,提高了种群在搜索区域中的离散性和MRFO算法的全局搜索能力。利用基准测试函数,验证了RLMRFO算法的有效性;采用STP6-120/36和STM6-40/36两种光伏组件的数据集对RLMRFO-TDM模型的参数辨识进行性能测试,与其他模型相比,RLMRFO-TDM模型的辨识精度、稳定性以及收敛速度表现最优。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	简献忠
	王鹏
	王如志

关键词 ：计量学, 光伏电池, 参数辨识, 折射学习, 蝠鲼优化算法

Abstract：In order to solve the problems of low parameter identification accuracy and poor stability in the current photovoltaic module model, a three-diode photovoltaic module parameter identification model (RLMRFO-TDM) based on manta ray foraging optimization algorithm and the refraction learning mechanism is proposed. The model integrates the differential evolution mechanism into the population updating link of MRFO algorithm, improves the local exploration ability of MRFO algorithm and speeds up the convergence speed of MRFO algorithm. The introduction of refraction learning mechanism improves the randomness of MRFO algorithm, the discreteness of population in the search area and the global search ability of MRFO algorithm. The benchmark function is used to verify the effectiveness of RLMRFO algorithm. The data sets of STP6-120/36 and STM6-40/36 photovoltaic modules are used to test the performance of parameter identification of RLMRFO-TDM model. Compared with other models, RLMRFO-TDM model has the best identification accuracy, stability and convergence speed.

Key words： metrology photovoltaic cell parameter identification refraction learning MRFO algorithm

收稿日期: 2022-02-25 发布日期: 2023-01-13

PACS:

TB971

基金资助:国家自然科学基金(11774017)

作者简介: 简献忠(1969-),男,上海理工大学教授、研究生导师,博士,主要从事新能源、电能质量分析与无功优化等方面的研究。Email:jianxz@usst.edu.cn

引用本文:

简献忠,王鹏,王如志. 基于改进蝠鲼优化算法的光伏组件参数辨识模型[J]. 计量学报, 2023, 44(1): 109-119.
IAN Xian-zhong,WANG Peng,WANG Ru-zhi. Parameter Identification Model of Photovoltaic Module Based on Improved Manta Ray Optimization Algorithm. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2023, 44(1): 109-119.

链接本文:

http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2023.01.16 或 http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/CN/Y2023/V44/I1/109

［3］	吴忠强, 刘重阳. 基于IHHO算法的光伏电池工程模型的参数辨识［J］. 计量学报, 2021, 42(2): 221-227.
［1］	Emad D, EL-Hameed M A, Yousef M T, et al. Computational methods for optimal planning of hybrid renewable microgrids: a comprehensive review and challenges［J］. Archives of computational methods in engineering, 2019, 27(7): 1297-1319.
［2］	吴忠强,申丹丹,尚梦瑶,等.基于改进蝗虫优化算法的光伏电池模型参数辨识［J］.计量学报, 2020, 41(12): 1536-1543.
	Wu Z Q, Liu C Y. Parameter identification of photovoltaic cell engineering model based on IHHO algorithm［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2021, 42(2): 221-227.
［5］	Yu K J, Liang J J, Qu B Y, et al. Parameters identification of photovoltaic models using an improved JAYA optimization algorithm［J］. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 150: 742-753.
［7］	Qais M H, Hasanien H M, Alghuwainem S. Enhanced salp swarm algorithm: application to variable speed wind generators［J］. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2019, 80: 82-96.
［9］	Abdel-Basset M, Mohamed R, El-Fergany A, et al. Parameters identification of PV triple-diode model using improved generalized normal distribution algorithm［J］. Mathematics,2021, 9(9): 955-955.
［10］	Elazab O S, Hasanien H M, Elgendy M A, et al. Parameters estimation of single- and multiple-diode photovoltaic model using whale optimisation algorithm［J］. IET Renewable Power Generation, 2018, 12(15):1755-1761.
	Wu Z Q, Shen D D, Shang M Y, et al. Parameter identification of photovoltaic cell model based on improved Grasshopper Optimization algorithm［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2020, 41(12): 1536-1543.
［4］	Drouiche I, Harrouni S, Arab A H. A new approach for modelling the aging PV module upon experimental Ⅰ-Ⅴ curves by combining translation method and five-parameters model［J］. Electric Power Systems Research, 2018, 163: 231-241.
［6］	Qais M H, Hasanien H M, Alghuwainem S. Identification of electrical parameters for three-diode photovoltaic model using analytical and sunflower optimization algorithm［J］. Applied Energy, 2019, 250(1): 109-117.
［8］	Soliman M A, Hasanien H M, Alkuhayli A. Marine predators algorithm for parameters identification of triple-diode photovoltaic models［J］. IEEE Access, 2020, 8(99): 155832-155842.
［11］	Aoun N, Bailek N. Evaluation of mathematical methods to characterize the electrical parameters of photovoltaic modules［J］. Energy Conversion and Canagement, 2019, 193(4): 25-38.
［12］	El-Hameed M A, Elkholy M M, El-Fergany A A. Three-diode model for characterization of industrial solar generating units using manta-rays foraging optimizer: analysis and validations［J］. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020, 219(1): 8-10.
［14］	Qais M, Hasanien H M, Alghuwainem S, et al. Coyote optimization algorithm for parameters extraction of three-diode photovoltaic models of photovoltaic modules［J］. Energy, 2019, 187(8): 116001-116001.
［16］	Elazab O S, Hasanien H M, Alsaidan I, et al. Parameter estimation of three diode photovoltaic model using grasshopper optimization algorithm［J］. Energies, 2020, 13(2): 497-512.
［18］	Hassan M H, Houssein E H, Mahdy M A, et al. An improved manta ray foraging optimizer for cost-effective emission dispatch problems［J］. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2021, 100(2): 1-1.
［21］	Long W, Wu T, Jiao J, et al. Refraction-learning-based whale optimization algorithm for high-dimensional problems and parameter estimation of PV model［J］. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2020, 89(3): 103457.1-103457.14.
［13］	Soliman M A, Al-Durra A, Hasanien H M. Electrical parameters identification of three-diode photovoltaic model based on equilibrium optimizer algorithm［J］. IEEE Access, 2021, 9(99): 41891-41901.
［15］	Qais M H, Hasanien H M, Alghuwainem S. Parameters extraction of three-diode photovoltaic model using computation and harris hawks optimization ［J］. Energy, 2020, 195(4): 117040.1-117040.13.
［17］	Zhao W, Zhang Z, Wang L. Manta ray foraging optimization: an effective bio-inspired optimizer for engineering applications ［J］. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2020, 87: 103300.1-103300.25.
［19］	Izci D, Ekinci S, Eker E, et al. Improved manta ray foraging optimization using opposition-based learning for optimization problems［C］//2020 International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications, Ankara, Turkey, 2020.
［20］	Deng W, Shang S, Cai X, et al. An improved differential evolution algorithm and its application in optimization problem［J］. Soft Computing, 2021, 25(1): 5277-5298.
［23］	Hu Z, Gong W, Li S. Reinforcement learning-based differential evolution for parameters extraction of photovoltaic models［J］. Energy Reports, 2021, 7(7): 916-928.
［22］	Gao W, Liu S, Huang L. A novel artificial bee colony algorithm based on modified search equation and orthogonal learning［J］. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2013, 43(3): 1011-1024.
［24］	Tong N T, Pora W. A parameter extraction technique exploiting intrinsic properties of solar cells［J］. Applied Energy, 2016, 176(5): 104-115.