双氧法测量烟气再循环率及不确定度分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2022.09.18

摘要
图/表
参考文献(18)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1194 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要为准确测量、计算得到烟气再循环率,在燃气组分及浓度不变的情况下,基于化学反应平衡方程式推导得到烟气再循环率的计算公式,进而提出测量燃气锅炉烟气氧浓度和烟气-空气混合气氧浓度的双氧法。为定量分析测量结果的质量,基于国标中的GUM法对双氧法进行不确定度评定,并根据不确定度要求为仪器选择提出指导意见。研究发现,当烟气氧浓度测量结果为1.91%、混合气氧浓度测量结果为18.64%时,通过双氧法计算烟气再循环率R为13.45%,扩展不确定度为1.56%。混合气氧浓度测量不确定度对双氧法扩展不确定度影响很大,在选择测量仪器时,混合气氧浓度测量仪器的扩展不确定度可小于烟气氧浓度测量仪器。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	曾吉鹏
	潘登
	管坚
	于吉明
	高乃平
	朱彤

关键词 ：计量学, 烟气再循环率, 双氧法, 燃气锅炉, 不确定度分析

Abstract：A formula for calculating the flue gas recirculation rate is derived based on a chemical reaction balance equation with constant gas components and concentrations. A dual oxygen method for measuring flue gas oxygen concentration and flue gas-air mixture oxygen concentration in gas boilers is proposed. In order to quantify the quality of the measurement results, the uncertainty of the dioxygen method is assessed based on the GUM method in national standards, and instrument selection guidance is presented based on uncertainty requirements. It is found that when the flue gas oxygen concentration measurement result is 1.91% and the mixed gas oxygen concentration measurement result is 18.64%, the flue gas recirculation rate R calculated by the dual oxygen method is 13.45% with an extended uncertainty of 1.56%. The uncertainty of the mixed gas oxygen concentration measurement has a significant impact on the extended uncertainty of the dioxygen method. When measurement instrument is selected, the extended uncertainty of a mixed gas oxygen concentration measurement instrument can be less than the extended uncertainty of the flue gas oxygen concentration measurement instrument.

Key words： metrology flue gas recirculation rate dual oxygen method gas boiler uncertainty analysis

收稿日期: 2020-08-17 发布日期: 2022-09-19

PACS:

TB99

基金资助:国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFF0209801)

通讯作者: 高乃平(1978-),江苏扬州人,同济大学教授,主要从事天然气高效清洁燃烧、建筑与地下空间的通风等方面的工作。Email:gaonaiping@tongji.edu.cn E-mail: gaonaiping@tongji.edu.cn

作者简介: 曾吉鹏(1996-),江西樟树人,同济大学硕士研究生,研究方向为天然气低氮燃烧及烟气再循环率测量。Email:zengjipeng@tongji.edu.cn

引用本文:

曾吉鹏,潘登,管坚,于吉明,高乃平,朱彤. 双氧法测量烟气再循环率及不确定度分析[J]. 计量学报, 2022, 43(9): 1220-1225.
ZENG Ji-peng,PAN Deng,GUAN Jian,YU Ji-ming,GAO Nai-ping,ZHU Tong. Measurement Method of Flue Gas Recirculation Rate and Uncertainty Analysis. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2022, 43(9): 1220-1225.

链接本文:

http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2022.09.18 或 http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/CN/Y2022/V43/I9/1220

［1］Yue T, Gao X, Gao J, et al. Emission characteristics of NOx, CO, NH3 and VOCs from gas-fired industrial boilers based on field measurements in Beijing city, China ［J］. Atmospheric Environment, 2018, 184: 1-8.
［2］安文旗, 朱彤, 潘登, 等. 烟气再循环对金属纤维表面燃烧器NOx排放和燃烧稳定性的影响［J］. 燃烧科学与技术, 2019, 25 (4): 365-371.
An W Q, Zhu T, Pan D, et al. NOx Emission Characteristics and Combustion Stability of Metal Fiber Surface Burner with Flue Gas Recirculation［J］. Jouranl of Combustion Science and Technology, 2019, 25 (4): 365-371.
［3］Liu H, Zhang L, Li Q, et al. Effect of FGR position on the characteristics of combustion, emission and flue gas temperature deviation in a 1000MW tower-type double-reheat boiler with deep-air-staging ［J］. Fuel, 2019, 246: 285-294.
［4］Gamrat S, Poraj J, Bodys J, et al. Influence of external flue gas recirculation on gas combustion in a coke oven heating system ［J］. Fuel Processing Technology, 2016, 152: 430-437.
［5］宋少鹏, 卓建坤, 李娜, 等. 燃料分级与烟气再循环对天然气低氮燃烧特性影响机理［J］. 中国电机工程学报, 2016, 36 (24): 6849-6858.
Song S P, Zhuo J K, Li N, et al. Low NOx Combustion Mechanism of a Natural Gas Burner With Fuel-staged and Flue Gas Recirculation ［J］. Proceedings of The Chinese Society for Electrical Engineering, 2016, 36 (24): 6849-6858.
［6］Yu B, Lee S, Lee C E, et al. Study of NOx emission characteristics in CH4/air non-premixed flames with exhaust gas recirculation ［J］. Energy, 2015, 91: 119-127.
［7］Wang T, Baker R. Coriolis flowmeters: a review of developments over the past 20 years, and an assessment of the state of the art and likely future directions ［J］. Flow Measurement & Instrumentation, 2014, 40: 99-123.
［8］韩静, 冯建玉, 崔雪, 等. 一种流动调整器在焚烧炉烟气流量测量中的应用［J］. 工业炉, 2014, 36 (2): 24-27.
Han J, Feng J Y, Cui X, et al. Application of A Flow Conditioner in Gas Flow Measurement in Incinerator ［J］. Industrial Furnace, 2014, 36 (2): 24-27.
［9］佟纯涛. 燃煤机组烟气流量软测量技术研究［D］.保定:华北电力大学, 2017.

［10］周英杰. 废气再循环率的测量方法及其分析［J］. 交通节能与环保, 2007 (3): 26-28.
Zhou Y J. Measurement and Analysis of Waste Gas Recycling Rate ［J］. Energy Conservation & Environmental Protection in Transportation, 2007(3): 26-28.
［11］陈智林. 基于宽域氧传感器的直喷汽油机EGR率测量及EGR响应研究［C］//2018中国汽车工程学会年会.2018: 808-814.
［12］张海滨, 王中宇, 刘智敏. 测量不确定度评定的验证研究［J］. 计量学报, 2007,28 (3): 193-197.
Zhang H B, Wang Z Y, Liu Z M. On the Verification of Measurement Uncertainty ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2007, 28(3): 193-197.
［13］倪育才. 实用测量不确定度评定［M］.北京: 中国质检出版社, 2016.
［14］刘园园, 杨健, 赵希勇, 等. GUM法和MCM法评定测量不确定度对比分析［J］. 计量学报, 2018, 39 (1): 135-139.
Liu Y Y, Yang J, Zhao X Y, et al. Comparative Analysis of Uncertainty Measurement Evaluation with GUM and MCM ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2018, 39 (1): 135-139.

［15］陈凌峰. 抽样引起的测量不确定度评定［J］. 计量学报, 2020, 41(7): 891-896.
Chen L F. Evaluating the Sampling Contribution to the Measurement Uncertainty［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2020, 41(7): 891-896.
［16］俱岩飞,王俊彪,常崇义, 等. 考虑非正定相关性的测量不确定度蒙特卡洛评定方法［J］. 计量学报, 2022, 43(6): 830-836.
Ju Y F, Wang J B, Chang C Y, et al. Monte Carlo Method for the Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation Considering Non-positive Definite Correlation［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2022, 43(6): 830-836.

［17］Trevisan L, Fabricio D A K. Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation of Brinell Hardness Test: Gum And Monte Carlo Method ［J］. Periodico Tche Quimica, 2018, 15: 252-258.
［18］GB/T 27418—2017测量不确定度评定和表示［S］.