10 kPa气体活塞式压力计计量性能测试研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2022.04.12

摘要
图/表
参考文献(21)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1962 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要用FPG8601型活塞式压力计作为标准器,对一台测量范围为1.2~10kPa的气体活塞式压力计的活塞有效面积和鉴别阈进行了测试研究。介绍了标准器的特点和溯源方法,对被测器需要进行全量程测试的必要性和测试程序进行了阐述。测试覆盖了包括被测器测量下限在内的5个不同压力点,计算得到其活塞有效面积的平均值为9.77371cm²。通过在被测器活塞上加放不同质量的小砝码,读取标准器相应的压力变化来对被测器鉴别阈进行测试,反映出鉴别阈优于5mg,相对于测试点而言优于2×10^-5。对各测试点活塞有效面积的不确定进行了评定,结果显示相对扩展不确定度不超过9.4×10^-5。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	悦进
	杨远超

关键词 ：计量学, 气体活塞式压力计, 有效面积, 鉴别阈

Abstract：To measure the effective area and discrimination threshold of a 1.2~10kPa pneumatic piston gauge,the FPG8601-type piston gauge (FPG) was used as the standard.The characteristics and traceability methods of the FPG8601-type piston gauge are introduced.The necessity of full-range measurement of pneumatic piston gauge and measurement procedure are expounded.The measurements were carried out at five different pressure including the lower limit of pneumatic piston gauge,and the average effective area of the piston-cylinder is 9.77371cm² .By changing different small weights on the piston of pneumatic piston gauge and reading the corresponding pressure value of the FPG8601-type piston gauge,the discrimination threshold of pneumatic piston gauge was measured.The discrimination threshold is better than 5mg which is better than 2×10^-5 compared with the measurement point.The uncertainty of the effective area at each point was evaluated,and the results show that the relative expanded uncertainty does not exceed 9.4×10^-5.

Key words： metrology pneumatic piston gauge effective area discrimination threshold

收稿日期: 2020-06-29 发布日期: 2022-04-08

PACS:

TB935

基金资助:中国计量科学研究院基本科研业务费项目(AKYGH2001,AKYZZ2007)

作者简介: 悦进(1979-), 四川内江人, 中国计量科学研究院高级工程师, 主要从事压力计量研究。Email:yuej@nim.ac.cn

引用本文:

悦进,杨远超. 10 kPa气体活塞式压力计计量性能测试研究[J]. 计量学报, 2022, 43(4): 507-512.
YUE Jin,YANG Yuan-chao. Research on Metrological Performance of 10kPa Pneumatic Piston Gauge. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2022, 43(4): 507-512.

链接本文:

http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2022.04.12 或 http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/CN/Y2022/V43/I4/507

［1］蒋思敬, 姚士春. 压力计量［M］. 北京:中国计量出版社, 1991.
［2］Rendle C G. A Large Area Piston Gauge for Differential and Gauge Pressure from Zero to 3. 2kPa［J］. Metrologia, 1993/1994(30):611-613.
［3］Sutton C M, Fitzgerald M P, Jack D G. Conventional pressure balances as reference standards for pressures in the range 10Pa to 10kPa ［J］. Metrologia, 1999 (5):227-230.
［4］Kojima M, Kobata T, Saitou K, et al. Development of small differential pressure standard using double pressure balances［J］. Metrologia, 2005, 42 (6):227-230.
［5］李燕华, 孙俊峰. 基于活塞式压力计和数字压力计的微小压力测量新方法［J］. 计量学报, 2012, 33(6):528-531.
Li Y H, Sun J F. A New Method for Low Differential Gauge Pressure Measurement Based on Piston Gauge and Digital Pressure Gauge［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2012, 33 (6):528-531.
［6］Bair M, Delajoud P. A force balanced piston gauge for very low gauge and absolute pressure［C］//NCSL Int. Workshop and Symp, 2002.
［7］Bair M, Delajoud P. Typical pressure measurement unc-ertainty defined by an FPG8601 force balanced piston gauge［R］. DH Instruments, Technical Note 2090TN05, 2004.
［8］Hendricks J H, Olson D A. 1~15000Pa Absolute mode comparisons between the NIST ultrasonic interferometer manometers and non-rotating force-balanced piston gauges［J］. Measurement, 2010, 43:664-674.
［9］Otal P, Legras J C. Metrological characterization of a new standard, in absolute and gauge pressure modes, in the range 1Pa to 15000Pa［J］. Metrologia, 2005(42), 216-219.
［10］悦进. 压力基准量值复现与活塞有效面积研究［D］. 北京:北京化工大学, 2011.
［11］Yang Y C, Yue J. Calculation of effective area for the NIM primary pressure standards［J］. PTB-Mitteilun-gen, 2011, 121 (3):266-269.
［12］盛以唐. 活塞式压力计有效面积的研究及其在基准器上的应用［J］. 计量学报, 1982, 3 (3):161-174.
Sheng Y T. Study on the Effective Area of Piston Gauge and Its Application in the Primary Standard［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 1982, 3 (3):161-174.
［13］杨远超. 活塞压力计自动化校准方法研究［J］. 计量学报, 2017, 38 (6):708-712.
Yang Y C. Research on Automated Calibration Method for Piston Gauges ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2017, 38 (6):708-712.
［14］杨远超, 悦进, 李燕华. CCM. P-K13传递标准的有效面积和形变系数及不确定度分析［J］. 计量学报, 2011, 32 (5):441-445.
Yang Y C, Yue J, Li Y H. The Effective Area and Distortion Coefficient of CCM. P-K13 Transfer Standard and the Analysis of Uncertainty［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2011, 32 (5):441-445.
［15］曾麟, 杨远超, 悦进, 等. 气体活塞式压力计基准量值传递自动化研究［J］. 计量学报, 2021, 42(10):1316-1322.
Zeng L, Yang Y C,Yue J, et al. Research on Automated Dissemination of Primary Standard for Pneumatic Piston Gauges［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2021, 42(10):1316-1322.
［16］ JJG1086-2013 气体活塞式压力计检定规程［S］. 2013.
［17］中国计量测试学会压力计量专业委员会. 压力测量不确定度评定实例［M］. 北京:中国质检出版社, 2012.
［18］张忠立, 王灿, 林正皓, 等. 基于双向流固耦合技术的活塞式压力计研究［J］. 计量学报, 2021, 42(3):276-281.
Zhang Z L,Wang C, Lin Z H, et al. Research of Piston Gauge Based on Two-way Fluid-structure Interaction Technique［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2021, 42(3):276-281.
［19］王淮阳, 胡珊珊, 刘正士, 等. 双活塞式高精度深海压力模拟方法［J］. 计量学报, 2021, 42(2):199-203.
Wang H Y, Hu S S, Liu Z S, et al. High Precision Deep Sea Pressure Simulation Method with Double Pistons［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2021, 42(2):199-203.
［20］悦进, 杨远超, 王金库. FPG8601微压气体活塞式压力计的校准［J］. 计量技术, 2017(10):51-54.
［21］ JJF 1008-2008压力计量名词术语及定义［S］. 2008.