一种燃料热沉标准物质候选物的纯度定值及不确定度分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2021.06.20

摘要
图/表
参考文献(17)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (682 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要一种多环烃化合物作为超声速飞行器用燃料热沉标准物质候选物,对于燃料的热沉准确计量具有十分重要的意义。通过采用质量平衡和核磁定量两种不同测量原理的方法,对这种热沉标准物质候选物的纯度进行了定值,并进行了不确定度分析和评定。在此过程中,采用气相色谱法(GC-FID)对候选物的分装样品进行了均匀性检验和稳定性考察。研究结果表明,标准物质候选物纯度均匀性良好,且在１年常规储存条件下(20 ℃,101.325kPa)具有良好的稳定性。标准物质候选物定值结果的标准值为99.42%, 扩展不确定度为0.84%(k=2)。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ：计量学, 热沉, 多环芳香烃, 标准物质候选物, 质量平衡, 核磁定量, 不确定度

Abstract：A kind of polycyclic hydrocarbon compound can be used as a candidate of fuel heat sink reference material for hypersonic aircrafts, which is of great significance on heat sink measurement. Two different methods, mass balance and quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance approaches were adopted to characterize the purity of the candidate. Moreover, main uncertainty contributions were analyzed, and then the uncertainty of the purity of the candidate was evaluated. In the process of purity valuation, GC-FID was used to test the homogeneity and stability of the subpackage samples. The results showed that the candidate has a good homogeneity, and can store for at least one year under normal storage conditions (20 ℃, 101.325 kPa). The purity of the candidate is 99.42% with the expanded uncertainty of 0.84% (k=2).

Key words： metrology heat sink polycyclic hydrocarbon reference material candidate mass balance quantitative nuclear magnetic uncertainty

收稿日期: 2020-04-13 发布日期: 2021-06-23

PACS:

TB99

基金资助:国家自然科学基金(21905222)

通讯作者: 孙道安(1986-),男,安徽池州人,博士,西安代化学研究所副研究员,主要从事高能燃料化学研究。Email: sundaoan2008@126.com E-mail: wzx20407@126.com

作者简介: 王志轩(1986-), 男,河南濮阳人,西安代化学研究所工程师,主要从事化学计量与标准物质研究方面的工作。Email: wzx20407@126.com

引用本文:

王志轩,徐强,杜咏梅,李春迎,孙道安,李娇毅,张皋,吕剑. 一种燃料热沉标准物质候选物的纯度定值及不确定度分析[J]. 计量学报, 2021, 42(6): 815-821.
WANG Zhi-xuan, XU Qiang, DU Yong-mei, LI Chun-ying, SUN Dao-an,LI Jiao-yi, ZHANG Gao, Lü JianWANG Zhi-xuan, XU Qiang, DU Yong-mei, LI Chun-ying, SUN Dao-an,LI Jiao-yi, ZHANG Gao, Lü Jian. The Purity Value and Uncertainty Analysis of a Fuel Heat Sink Reference Material Candidate. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2021, 42(6): 815-821.

链接本文:

http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2021.06.20 或 http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/CN/Y2021/V42/I6/815

［1］ Gao M, Hou L, Zhang X, et al. Coke Deposition Inhibition for Endothermic Hydrocarbon Fuels in a Reforming Catalyst-Coated Reactor［J］. Energy & Fuels, 2019, 33(7): 6126-6133.
［2］ Sun D A, Li C Y, Du Y M, et al. Effects of endothermic hydrocarbon fuel composition on the pyrolysis and anti-coking performance under supercritical conditions［J］. Fuel, 2019, 239: 659-666.
［3］ Sun D A, Du Y M, Zhang J W, et al. Effects of molecular structures on the pyrolysis and anti-coking performance of alkanes for thermal management［J］. Fuel, 2017, 194: 266-273.
［4］贺芳, 米镇涛, 孙海云. 提高烃类燃料热沉的研究进展［J］. 化学进展, 2006, 18(7/8): 1041-1048.
He F, Mi Z T, Sun H Y. Improvement of heat sink of endothermic hydrocarbon fuels［J］. Progress in Chemistry, 2006, 18(7/8): 1041-1048.
［5］孙道安,吕剑,李春迎, 等. 热沉定值系统不确定度评定［J］. 计量学报, 2021, 42(5): 577-581.
Sun D A, Lü J, Li C Y, et al. The Evaluation of Uncertainty of Valuing System for Heat Sink［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2021, 42(5): 577-581.
［6］王钊, 史乃捷, 穆克然木·阿布利孜. 化肥标准物质中钾含量准确定值方法研究［J］. 计量学报, 2018, 39(3): 425-430.
Wang Z, Shi N J, Mukram A. Research on accurate measurement of potassium content in fertilizer reference materials［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2018, 39(3): 425-430.
［7］马康, 李小佳, 崔萌萌, 等. 高效液相色谱法测定葡萄酒中苋菜红的不确定度评定［J］. 计量学报, 2015, 36(1): 102-106.
Ma K, Li X J, Cui M M, et al. Uncertainty evaluation for the determination of amaranths red in wine samples by high performance liquid chromatography［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2015, 36(1): 102-106.
［8］高娜, 王文兰, 郭军, 等. 高效液相色谱法测定鳕鱼中孔雀石绿含量的不确定度评定［J］. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2019, 10(3): 653-657.
Gao N, Wang W L, Guo J, et al. Uncertainty evaluation for determination of malachite green in Gadus by high performance liquid chromatography［J］. Journal of Food Safety and Quality, 2019, 10(3): 653-657.
［9］付川, 史乃捷, 冯流星, 等. 牛肝标准物质中氯含量的定值方法研究［J］. 计量学报, 2019, 40(6): 1129-1134.
Fu C, Shi N J, Feng L X, et al. Determination of Chlorine in Bovine Liver Reference Material［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2019, 40(6): 1129-1134.
［10］刘思章, 隋志伟. 张韬, 等. 噬菌体ΦX174标准物质定值方法研究［J］. 计量学报, 2019 ,40(3): 511-516.
Liu S Z, Sui Z W, Zhang T, et al. Study on Measurement System for Bacteriophage ΦX174 Reference Material［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2019, 40(3): 511-516.
［11］王涛, 刘鹏鸣. 杜晖, 等. 化妆品中维生素D2、维生素D3含量不确定度评定［J］. 计量学报, 2019, 40(4): 728-735.
Wang T, Liu P M, Du H, et al. Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty in the Determination of Vitamin D2 and Vitamin D3 in Cosmetics［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2019, 40(4): 728-735.
［12］田衎, 岳亚萍, 杨永, 等. 质量平衡法测定金属银纯度的不确定度评定［J］. 化学试剂, 2019, 41(5): 478-481.
Tian K, Yue Y P, Yang Y, et al. Uncertainty Evaluating of Metallic Silver Purity Analysis by Mass Balance Method［J］. Chemical Regents, 2019, 41(5): 478-481.
［13］胡树国, 张体强. 高纯氦气中杂质标准物质的研制［J］. 计量学报, 2018, 39(6): 908-913.
Hu S G, Zhang T Q. Development of Impurity Reference Materials in High Purity Helium［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2018, 39(6): 908-913.
［14］ JJF 1006-1994 一级标准物质研制技术规范［S］. 北京: 中国计量出版社, 1993.
［15］王家睿, 陈黎明, 李杰, 等. 三氯卡班纯度标准物质的定值及不确定度分析［J］. 化学试剂, 2019, 41(4): 406-410.
Wang J R, Chen L M, Li J, et al. Value assignment anduncertainty evaluation of purity reference material of triclocarban［J］. Chemical Regents, 2019, 41(4): 406-410.
［16］马浩淼, 吴海. 王德发, 等. 面积归一法测定萜烯试剂纯度［J］. 计量学报, 2018, 39(5): 736-740.
Ma H M, Wu H, Wang D F, et al. Purity Analysis of Some Terpenes by Peak Area Normalization Method［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2018, 39(5): 736-740.
［17］王萌玉, 全灿, 孙永跃, 等. 氢定量核磁共振法测定金丝桃苷标准物质纯度［J］. 化学试剂, 2019, 42(4): 425-429.
Wang M Y, Quan C, Sun Y Y, et al. Purity Assignment of Hyperoside CRMs by 1H-qNMR［J］. Chemical Regents, 2019, 42(4): 425-429.