Abstract The total particle counting efficiency and fluorescence particle counting efficiency were evaluated by the fluorescence bioaerosol monitor, and verified by a variety of microbial aerosols in laboratory and practical application scenarios. By comparing the values of two traditional off-line detection methods, colony counting method and microscope observation method, it was found that the real-time bioaerosol monitoring technology has a good agreement with the traditional detection methods. At the same time, the bioaerosol monitor was used to monitor biological particles in different application scenarios, and the reliability of the detection results was verified.
Felini M, Johnson E, Preacely N, et al. A pilot case-cohort study of liver and pancreatic cancers in poultry workers［J］. Ann. Epidemiol. 2011, 21(10):755-766.
Georgakopoulos D G, Despres V, Frohlich-Nowoisky J, et al. Microbiology and atmospheric processes: biological, physical and chemical characterization of aerosol particles［J］. Biogeosciences. 2009, 6:721-737.
［7］
Maheswaran D, Zeng Y, Chan-Yeung M, et al. Exposure to beta-(1,3)-D-glucan in house dust at age 7-10 is associated with airway hyperresponsiveness and atopic asthma by age 11-14［J］. Plos One. 2014, 9(6):1-11.
Liu J Q, Zhang G C, Wu D, et al. Study on Evaluation Method of Physical Efficiency of Cyclone Microbiological Sampler［J］. Acta Metrologia Sinica, 2022, 43(10):1378-1381.
Geng Z, Wei S B, Wang L, et al. Verification of Real-time Microbial Monitoring Technology Based on the Principle of Laser-induced Fluorescence Under USP<1223> Standard and Application in Hospital PIVAS Clean Room［J］. Chinese Journal of Modern Applied Pharmacy, 2021,38(23):2992-3001.
Tian Y, Zhang G C, Wu D, et al. Device Construction and Method Research of Biological Counting Evalutation of Bioaerosol Detectors, Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2021,42(12):1687-1692.
［18］
张霞.微生物显微镜直接计数法的点滴改进［J］.生物学通报,1998(1):27.
［1］
Kim K H, Kabir E, Jahan S A. Airborne bioaerosols and their impact on human health［J］. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 2018, 67: 23-35.
Després V, Huffman J, Burrows S, et al. Primary biological aerosol particles in the atmosphere: a review［J］. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 2012, 64(1):1-58
［3］
Douglas P, Robertson S, Gay R, et al. A systematic review of the public health risks of bioaerosols from intensive farming［J］. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 2018, 221(2): 134-173.
［5］
Xu Z Q, Wu Y, Shen F X, et al. Bioaerosol Science, Technology, and Engineering: Past, Present, and Future［J］. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2011, 45(11):1337-1349.
［9］
Brosseau L, Vesley D, Rice N, et al. Differences in Detected Fluorescence Among Several Bacterial Species Measured with a Direct-Reading Particle Sizer and Fluorescence Detector［J］. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2000, 32(6):545-558.
［10］
Phlker C, Huffman J A, Pschl U. Autofluorescence of atmospheric bioaerosols-fluorescent biomolecules and potential interferences［J］. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2012, 5(29): 37-71.
Pan Y T, Zhang G C, Liu J Q, et al. Development and Application of Fluorescent Microsphere Reference Material for Calibration of Bioaerosol Monitor Instrument［J］. Environmental Monitoring in China, 2021,37(4):192-198.
［15］
Kanaani H, Hargreaves M, Smith J, et al. Performance of UVAPS with respect to detection of airborne fungi［J］. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2007, 39(2):175-189
［17］
李洪臣,杨秀艳.使用血细胞计数板测定微生物数量实验的改进［J］.生物学通报,2007(7):22.
Zheng Y H, Li J, Chen H X, et al. Bioaerosol research: Yesterday, today and tomorrow［J］. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2018, 63(10):878-894.
Pan Y T, Zhang G C, Yang Z Q, et al. Research on calibration method of bioaerosol monitor instrument［J］. China Measurement and Test, 2020, 46(10):18-22.
［16］
Kanaani H, Hargreaves M, Ristovski Z, et al. Performance assessment of UVAPS: Influence of fungal spore age and air exposure［J］. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2006, 38(1):83-96
2023, Vol. 44 
