|
|
Study on Influence of Primary Suspension Damping on Running Quality of Vehicle Based on SIMPACK |
LIU Zhi-yuan1,ZHANG Hong-tao2,XU Teng-yang3,GUO Zhao-tuan3 |
1. Department of Urban Rail Transit, Zhengzhou Technical College, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China
2. College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Zhengzhou Railway Vocational and Technical College,
Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, China
3. State Key Laboratory of Traction Power, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China |
|
|
Abstract The dynamic model of a high-speed train and the three-dimensional structural schematic diagram of the primary suspension damping of the train are established. Based on the structure, the common failure forms of the primary suspension damping of the train are studied, and the influence of the primary suspension damping failure on the running quality of the vehicle is simulated and analyzed. The results show that the common faults of primary suspension damping are mainly caused by the serious wear of the skeleton seal, the serious aging of the O-ring and the emulsification of oil. Vehicle lateral and vertical stability is less affected as one damper or two dampers (one for each bogie) are failure. The index deterioration rate is less than 5%. Comfort has a certain impact, the index deterioration rate is up to 15%. Running quality deteriorates significantly as primary suspension dampings are all failure. Comfort deterioration is the most serious and the deterioration rate of the index reaches 186%.
|
Received: 21 December 2020
Published: 30 June 2022
|
|
|
|
|
[1]任尊松. 车辆系统动力学[M]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2007.
[2]Madalina D, Dragos I S. Influence of the Primary Suspension Damping on the Ride Comfort in the Railway Vehicles [J]. Material Science Forum, 2019, 957: 53-62.
[3]Sun W J, David T, Zhou J S. The influence of vehicle-track dynamic coupling on the fatigue failure of coil springs within the primary suspension of metro vehicles [J]. Vehicle System Dynamic, 2020, 58(11): 1694-1710.
[4]Wang R C, Wang Z W. Evaluation of power regeneration in primary suspension for a railway vehicle [J]. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 15(2): 265-278.
[5]黄先富, 门永林, 祝航. 地铁一系垂向减振器失效故障分析[J]. 铁道车辆, 2019, 57(3): 34-36.
Huang X F, Men Y L, Zhu H. Analysis of Failure Troubles in Primary Vertical Dampers on Metro Vehicles[J]. Rolling Stock, 2019, 57(3): 34-36.
[6]杨亮亮, 傅茂海, 张尚敬, 等. 一系垂向减振器对高速列车运行稳定性和平稳性的影响[J]. 铁道车辆, 2013, 51(1): 1-4.
Yang L L, Fu M H, Zhang S J, et al. The Effect of Features of Primary Vertical Dampers on the Running Stability and Ride Comfort of High Speed Passenger Cars [J]. Rolling Stock, 2013, 51(1): 1-4.
[7]南玲, 宋荣荣, 马卫华. 垂向减振器对铁道车辆动力学性能的影响分析[J]. 机械, 2009, 36(4): 9-13.
Nan L, Song R R, Ma W H. Influence Analysis of the Vertical Damper to the Railway Vehicle Dynamic Performance [J]. Machinery, 2009, 36(4): 9-13.
[8]徐传波, 徐腾养, 池茂儒. 动车组动力学性能与一系垂向减振器参数关系研究[J]. 机床与液压, 2019,47(1): 113-116.
Xu C B, Xu T Y, Chi M R. Research on Relationship between Dynamic Performance of EMU and First Stage Vertical Damping Parameters[J]. Machine Tool & Hydraulics, 2019, 47(1): 113-116.
[9]周长城, 于曰伟, 赵雷雷. 高速列车一系垂向悬挂系统最佳阻尼比的解析计算[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2016, 13(10): 1891-1898.
Zhou C C, Yu Y W, Zhao L L. Analysis Calculation of the Optimal Damping Ratio of Primary Vertical Suspension System for High-speed train[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2016, 13(10): 1891-1898.
[10]刘彬, 王营辉, 姜佳磊, 等. 轧机主传动系统扭振减振器参数设计及特性分析[J]. 计量学报, 2020, 41(11): 1391-1397.
Liu B, Wang Y H, Jiang J L, et al. Parameter Design and Characteristic Analysis of Torsional Vibration Damper for Main Drive System of Rolling Mill[J]. Acta Metrologica Sinica. 2020, 41(11): 1391-1397.
[11]白洋, 王大伟, 李正坤, 等. 能量天平悬挂系统初始位姿识别方法[J]. 计量学报, 2020, 41(3): 273-278.
Bai Y, Wang D W, Li Z K, et al. Recognition of Initial and Posture of Suspended Coil in Joule Balance[J]. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2020, 41(3): 273-278.
[12]胡敏, 黄运华, 谭皓尹. 一系垂向减振器角度对高速车辆运行性能的影响[J]. 机械工程与自动化, 2016(05): 56-57+60.
Hu M, Huang Y H, Tan H Y. Effect of Primary Damper Tilt Angle on High-speed EMU Running Behavior[J]. Mechanical Engineering & Automation, 2016(05): 56-57+60. |
|
|
|