Acta Metrologica Sinica  2020, Vol. 41 Issue (7): 891-896    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2020.07.21
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Evaluating the Sampling Contribution to the Measurement Uncertainty
CHEN Ling-feng
School of Optics and-photonics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
Download: PDF (1033 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  If the objective of the measurement is to estimate the value of the analyte concentration in a sampling target, then the uncertainty associated with the sampling process inevitably contributes to the uncertainty of the measurement result. Heterogeneity, ambiguity in the sampling protocols, loss of analyte and fine particles, or contamination from equipment or previous samples are among the most important factors contributing to uncertainty associated with sampling. The empirical approach by EURACHEM is introduced, the general error sources are quantified as the sampling precision, analytical precision, sampling bias and the analytical bias respectively. The uncertainties associated with sampling precision and analytical precision are evaluated through duplicate methods and analysis of variance. An example is given to demonstrate how to evaluate the uncertainty associated with the sampling and sample preparations.
Key wordsmetrology      measurement uncertainty      sampling      evaluation      analysis of variance     
Received: 25 January 2019      Published: 29 June 2020
PACS:  TB9  
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
CHEN Ling-feng
Cite this article:   
CHEN Ling-feng. Evaluating the Sampling Contribution to the Measurement Uncertainty[J]. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2020, 41(7): 891-896.
URL:  
http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2020.07.21     OR     http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/EN/Y2020/V41/I7/891
Copyright © Editorial Board of Acta Metrologica Sinica
Supported by:Beijing Magtech