基于有限元分析的活塞压力计形变系数理论计算

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2024.10.13

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (23)
Related Citation (11)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Based on the finite element analysis(FEA)method,the distortion coefficients of the 600kPa gas piston gauge and 500MPa oil piston gauge are computed. According to the coupling relationship between the pressure distribution in the piston-cylinder gap and the gap distortion, the final pressure distribution and gap values under a certain measuring pressure are determined by iteration calculations.Based on this, the effective areas of piston gauge at various pressure points are calculated, and the pressure distortion coefficient is obtained by the least-square fit. A script for computation is developed using Python and ANSYS APDL. The influence of tuning parameters on the results is studied, and the uncertainty of the computed distortion coefficient is estimated. For the 600kPa gas piston gauge, the difference between the computed distortion coefficients by FEA and simple theory is only 0.8%. For the 500MPa oil piston gauge,the distortion coefficient computed by FEA is consistent with the value from experimental measurement within the uncertainty.

Key words： pressure measurement distortion coefficient finite element analysis piston gauge effective area

Received: 10 May 2023 Published: 30 September 2024

PACS:

TB935

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	WANG Bowen
	MA Kun
	DONG Jia
	HUANG Qian
	YANG Ying
	YANG Yuanchao
	YUE Jin

Cite this article:

WANG Bowen,MA Kun,DONG Jia, et al. Theoretical Calculations for Distortion Coefficient of Piston Gauge Based on Finite Element Analysis[J]. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2024, 45(10): 1525-1532.

URL:

http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2024.10.13 OR http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/EN/Y2024/V45/I10/1525

［5］	曾麟, 杨远超, 悦进, 等. 气体活塞式压力计基准量值传递自动化研究［J］. 计量学报, 2021, 42 (10): 1316-1322.
［4］	杨远超. 活塞压力计自动化校准方法研究［J］. 计量学报, 2017, 38 (6): 708-12.
［3］	杨远超, 悦进, 李燕华. CCM. P-K13传递标准的有效面积和形变系数及不确定度分析［J］. 计量学报, 2011, 32 (5): 441-445.
［2］	Yang Y C, Yue J. Calculation of Effective Area for the NIM Primary Pressure Standards ［J］. PTB Mitteilungen, 2011, 121 (3): 266-269.
	YANG Y C, YUE J, LI Y H. The Effective Area and Distortion Coefficient of CCM. P-K13 Transfer Standard and the Analysis of Uncertainty ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2011, 32 (5): 441-5.
	YANG Y C. Research on Automated Calibration Method for Piston Gauges ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2017, 38 (6): 708-12.
	ZENG L, YANG Y C, YUE J, et al. Research on Automated Dissemination of Primary Standard for Pneumatic Piston Gauges ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2021, 42 (10): 1316-1322.
	WANG C, LIU H Y, YANG Y C, et al. Design of Key Parameters of Piston-cylinder Assembly of 500MPa Piston Pressure Gauge ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2021, 42 (12): 1624-1629.
［22］	MOLINAR G F, MAGHENZANI R, CRESTO P C, et al. Elastic Distortions in Piston-Cylinder Units at Pressures up to 0, 5 GPa ［J］. Metrologia, 1993, 29: 425-440.
［1］	DADSON R S, LEWIS S, PEGGS G N. The Pressure Balance, Theory and Practice ［M］. London: National Physical Laboratory, 1982.
［7］	MOLINAR G, BUONANNO G, GIOVINCO G, et al. Effectiveness of finite element calculation methods (FEM)on high performance pressure balances in liquid media up to 200MPa ［J］. Metrologia, 2005, 42 (6): S207-S11.
［8］	DOGRA S, YADAV S, BANDYOPADHYAY A K. Computer simulation of a 1.0GPa piston-cylinder assembly using finite element analysis (FEA)［J］. Measurement, 2010, 43 (10): 1345-1354.
［10］	BANDYOPADHYAY A K, OLSON D A. Characterization of a compact 200 MPa controlled clearance piston gauge as a primary pressure standard using the Heydemann and Welch method ［J］. Metrologia, 2006, 43 (6): 573-582.
［12］	KAJIKAWA H, IDE K, KOBATA T. Precise determination of the pressure distortion coefficient of new controlled-clearance piston-cylinders based on the Heydemann-Welch model ［J］. Rev Sci Instrum, 2009, 80 (9): 095101.doi:10.1063/1.3203150.PMID:19791958.
［14］	SAMODRO R A, CHOI I M, WOO S Y. Investigation of 1 GPa Controlled Clearance Piston Gauge Using Finite Element Analysis ［J］. MAPAN-J Metrol Soc India, 2020, 35 (1): 105-110.
［17］	SABUGA W, MOLINAR G, BUONANNO G, et al. Finite element method used for calculation of the distortion coefficient and associated uncertainty of a PTB 1GPa pressure balance-EUROMET project 463 ［J］. Metrologia, 2006, 43 (3): 311-25.
［18］	SABUGA W, PRIRUENROM T, BECIET G M M, et al. FEA calculation of pressure distortion coefficients of gas-operated pressure balances-EURAMET project 1039 ［J］. Measurement, 2012, 45 (10): 2464-2468.
［20］	SALAMA A D, SABUGA W, ULBIG P. Measurement of the elastic constants of pressure balance materials using resonance ultrasound spectroscopy ［J］. Measurement, 2012, 45 (10): 2472-2475.
［6］	王琛, 刘环宇, 杨远超, 等. 500MPa活塞式压力计活塞系统关键参数设计［J］. 计量学报, 2021, 42 (12): 1624-1629.
［13］	DOGRA S, SINGH J, LODH A, et al. A comparative approach for the characterization of a pneumatic piston gauge up to 8 MPa using finite element calculations ［J］. Measurement Science and Technology, 2011, 22 (2): 10.
［15］	SINGH J, KUMARASWAMIDHAS L A, BURA N, et al. Characterization of a standard pneumatic piston gauge using finite element simulation technique vs cross-float, theoretical and Monte Carlo approaches ［J］. Adv Eng Softw, 2020, 150: 12.
［23］	WOO S Y, LEE Y J, CHOI I M, et al. Effects of the O-ring used for sealing in high-pressure balances on measurements of pressure ［J］. Measurement Science and Technology, 2002, 13: 1353-1358.
［9］	LIU C G, ZHANG Z L, HONG B, et al. Elastic Distortion Calculation of a Controlled-Clearance Piston-Cylinder Assembly up to 1500 MPa Using Finite Element Method ［C］//2022 Journal of Physics Conference Series. 2264 012013.
［11］	YANG Y C, YUE J. Determination of the distortion coefficient of a 500 MPA free-deformation piston gauge using a controlled-clearance one up to 200MPa［C］//XX IMEKO World Congress Metrology for Green, Growth Busan, Korea, 2012.
［19］	SHARIPOV F, YANG Y C, RICKER J E, et al. Primary pressure standard based on piston-cylinder assemblies. Calculation of effective cross sectional area based on rarefied gas dynamics ［J］. Metrologia, 2016, 53 (5): 1177-1184.
［21］	PRAK D, HAJDUK T, KRAJCˇEK Z, et al. Analytical solutions of some model cases of piston-cylinder assemblies ［J］. Measurement Science and Technology, 2021, 33 (2): 24002-24012.
［16］	MOLINAR G, SABUGA W, ROBINSON G, et al. Comparison of methods for calculating distortion in pressure balances up to 400MPa-EUROMET project #256 ［J］. Metrologia, 1998, 35 (5): 739-759.