振动液柱管中不同尺度水听器灵敏度补偿方法

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2024.04.16

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (20)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (9195 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract A sound field model in the tube was established using COMSOL simulation software for different scales of spherical and cylindrical hydrophones. The interference of different scales of hydrophones on the sound field was analyzed, and the pressure sensitivity of different scales of hydrophones was compensated and corrected accordingly. The hydrophones of different scale were calibrated using a vibrating liquid column calibration device in the frequency band of 100~1000Hz, and the comparison results with the compensated hydrophone sensitivity value indicated that the size of the hydrophone affects the distribution of the surrounding sound field, resulting in uneven distribution of the sound field in the tube. When the size of the sensitive element is close to the inner diameter of the acoustic tube, the interference of the cylindrical hydrophones in the very low frequency band is close to 2.28dB, and the interference in the high frequency band is up to 5dB. And the cylindrical hydrophone of the same size had greater interference to the sound field than the spherical hydrophone. The sensitivity uncertainty of the hydrophone after compensation is within 0.52dB, which meets the requirements of the calibration of the vibrating liquid column method.

Key words： acoustics metrology calibration with a vibrating column of liquid pressure sensitivity cylindrical hydrophone spherical hydrophone uncertainty

Received: 16 February 2023 Published: 03 April 2024

PACS:

TB95

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	XIE Jianyu
	WANG Yuebing
	ZHAO Peng
	ZHANG Kai
	WANG Mingwei

Cite this article:

XIE Jianyu,WANG Yuebing,ZHAO Peng, et al. Sensitivity Compensation Method for Hydrophones with Different Scales in Vibrating Liquid Column Tube[J]. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2024, 45(4): 565-572.

URL:

http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2024.04.16 OR http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/EN/Y2024/V45/I4/565

［8］	陈毅, 贾广慧, 费腾, 等. 5Hz~10kHz频率范围矢量水听器校准国际主导比对［J］. 计量学报, 2020, 41 (10): 1279-1283.
［3］	王敏, 杨平, 何龙标, 等. 10~500 kHz水听器的激光外差干涉法原级校准［J］. 声学学报, 2021, 46 (4): 614-622.
［11］	王月兵, 黄勇军. 使用激光测振技术校准水听器灵敏度［J］. 声学学报, 2001, 28 (1): 29-33.
［12］	佟昊阳, 易燕, 李水, 等. 变温变压环境中大面积水听器灵敏度低频校准方法［J］. 计量学报, 2021, 42 (9): 1187-1192.
［1］	陈毅, 赵涵, 袁文俊. 水下电声参数测量［M］. 北京: 兵器工业出版社, 2017, 41-42.
［15］	何世平, 汤渭霖, 刘涛, 等. 水声声管的壁厚和弹性对内部声场的影响［J］. 船舶力学, 2003, 7 (5): 97-103.
［18］	SCHLOSS F,STRASBERG M . Hydrophone Calibration in a Vibrating Column of Liquid ［J］. J Acous Soc Am, 1962, 34 (7): 958-960.
［20］	陈鑫, 王刚, 叶正寅,等. CFD不确定度量化方法研究综述［J］. 空气动力学学报, 2021, 39 (4): 1-13.
［4］	SLATER W, CROCKER S, BAKER S. A primary method for the complex calibration of a hydrophone from 1 Hz to 2 kHz ［J］. Metrologia, 2018, 55 (1): 84-94.
	CHEN Y, JIA G H, FEI T, et al. The Pilot Comparison Calibration of Vector Receivers in the Frequency Range 5Hz to 10kHz ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2020, 41 (10): 1279-1283.
［6］	高静水压20Hz~3. 15kHz标准水听器 (耦合腔互易法):JJG 1056—2010 ［S］. 2010.
	CHEN Y, JIA G H, FEI T, et al. The Pilot Comparison Calibration of Vector Receivers in the Frequency Range 5 Hz to 10 kHz ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2020, 41 (10): 1279-1283.
	CHEN Y, PING Z H, ISAEV A E, et al. Supplementary Comparison of Free-field Hydrophone Calibrations in the Frequency Range 250 Hz to 8 kHz ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2016, 37 (1): 84-89.
	TONG H Y, YI Y, LI S, et al. Low-frequency Calibration of Sensitivity of Large-planar Hydrophones in Dynamic Environment ofPressure and Temperature ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2021, 42 (9): 1187-1192.
［14］	杨柳青, 平自红. 振动液柱管中水听器校准影响因素分析［C］ //四川省声学学会, 上海声学学会, 山东声学学会, 黑龙江省声学学会, 重庆声学学会. 2020中国西部声学学术交流会论文集. 《声学技术》编辑部, 2020.
［7］	STRASBERG M, SCHLOSS F. Calibration of pressure gradient transducers in an oscillating liquid column ［J］. J Acous Soc Am, 1973, 54 (2): 553.
［13］	MALARKODI A, LATHA G, SRIDHAR P, et al. Design considerations and establishment of a low frequency hydrophone calibration setup using the principle of vibrating water column ［J］. International Journal of Acoustics and Vibration, 2018, 23 (1): 44-48.
［16］	CUI S, KHOO D W Y. Underwater Calibration of Hydrophones at Very Low Frequencies from 30 Hz to 2 kHz ［J］. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 2018, 1065 (7):072015.
	CHEN X, WANG G, YE Z Y, et al. A Review of Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Computational Fluid Dynamics ［J］. Actc Aerodynamica Sinica, 2021, 39 (4):1-13.
［2］	IEC 60565: 2006, Underwater acoustics-Hydrophones-Calibration of hydrophones in the frequency range 0.01Hz to 1MHz ［S］. 2006.
	WANG M, YANG P, HE L B, et al. Primary Calibration of Hydrophones in the Frequency Range 10 to 500 kHz Using a Heterodyne Interferometer ［J］. Acta Acustica, 2021, 46 (4): 614-622.
［5］	陈毅, 贾广慧, 费腾, 等. 5Hz~10kHz 频率范围矢量水听器校准国际主导比对［J］. 计量学报, 2020, 41 (10): 1279-1283.
［9］	陈毅, 平自红, ISAEV A E, 等. 250Hz~8kHz频率范围水听器自由场校准补充比对［J］. 计量学报, 2016, 37 (1): 84-89.
［10］	YI C, ISAEV A E. Comparison of hydrophone calibrations in the frequency range 250 Hz to 200 kHz ［J］. Metrologia, 2011, 48 (1A):09004.
	WANG Y B, HUANG Y J. Calibration of Hydrophones Using Optical Technique ［J］. Acta Acustica, 2001, 28 (1): 29-33.
	HE S P,TANG W L, LIU T,et al. The Influence of the Wall Thickness and Elasticity of the Underwater Acoustic Tube on the Internal Sound Field ［J］. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2003,7 (5) : 97-103.
［17］	郑士杰, 袁文俊. 水声计量测试技术［M］. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学出版社, 1995: 79-82.
［19］	JCGM J. Evaluation of measurement data—Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement ［J］. Int Organ Stand Geneva ISBN, 2008, 50: 134.