|
|
|
| Design of Zero-crossing Demodulation System for Measurement of Underwater Acoustic Pressure by Optical Method |
| WANG Min1,YANG Ping1,HE Long-biao1,FENG Xiu-juan1,YANG Jia-li2,ZHANG Yue1 |
1. National Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029, China
2. College of Information Science & Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Optical heterodyne interferometry is the mainly recommended technique for the next generation of underwater acoustic standards. The output Doppler signal of the optical interferometer should be demodulated by proper demodulation method, which will directly affect the acoustic particle velocity and pressure. To obtain the accurate reconstruction of underwater acoustic pressure by optical method, a zero-crossing demodulation method is introduced and an on-line demodulation system is designed. This system uses two orthogonal signals generated by function generator to simulate the outputs of photodiodes. A differential amplifier combines the two signals into one, which is recorded by an oscilloscope. Then the data are read and processed by a program containing the zero-crossing demodulation method to extract the acoustic particle velocity. Experiment results demonstrate the validation of the demodulation method and system. The designed zero-crossing demodulation system could be applied to the reconstruction of underwater acoustic pressure using optical heterodyne interferometry directly.
|
|
Received: 29 January 2018
Published: 07 March 2019
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Ping Yang
E-mail: yangp@nim.ac.cn
|
|
|
|
［1］Theobald P D, Robinson S P, Thompson A D, et al. Technique for the calibration of hydrophones in the frequency range 10 to 600 kHz using a heterodyne interferometer and an acoustically compliant membrane ［J］. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2005, 118(5): 3 110-3 116.
［2］Koukoulas T, Robinson S, Rajagopal S, et al. A comparison between heterodyne and homodyne interferometry to realise the SI unit of acoustic pressure in water ［J］. Metrologia, 2016, 53(2): 891-898.
［3］Wang M, Yang P, He L B, et al. Effects of demodulation methods on the reproduction of underwater acoustic pressure by optical heterodyne interferometry ［C］//24th International Congress on Sound and Vibration. London, UK. 2017: 1-8.
［4］王月兵, 黄勇军. 使用激光测振技术校准水听器灵敏度 ［J］. 声学学报, 2001, 26(1): 29-33.
Wang Y B, Huang Y J. Calibration of hydrophones using optical technique［J］. Acta Acustica, 2001, 26(1): 29-33.
［5］Yang P, Xing G, He L. Calibration of high-frequency hydrophone up to 40 MHz by heterodyne interferometer ［J］. Ultrasonics, 2014, 54(1): 402-407.
［6］ISO 16063-41 Methods for the calibration of vibration and shock transducers—Part 41: Calibration of laser vibrometers［S］.Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.
［7］Koukoulas T, Theobald P, Robinson S, et al. Absolute calibration of hydrophones using heterodyne interferometry and zero-crossing signal demodulation ［C］// Underwater Acoustic Measurements: Technologies and Results, Greece. 2011: 1205-1210.
［8］Koukoulas T, Theobald P, Robinson S P, et al. Particle velocity measurements using heterodyne interferometry and Doppler shift demodulation for absolute calibration of hydrophones ［C］// ECUA. 11th European Conference on Underwater Acoustics. Edinburgh, Scotland. 2012: 1-10. |
|
|
|
2019, Vol. 40 
