|
|
|
| Study of Gas Pressure Dependence in the Multi-wire Proportional Counter on the Absolute Measurement for Alpha and Beta Sources Surface Emission Rates |
| LI Yu-qi1,2,WANG Ren-sheng3,ZHANG Ming1,ZHANG Jun-wei4,YANG Zhi-jie1,5,LIANG Jun-cheng1 |
1. National Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029, China
2. East China University of Technology, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330013 China
3. Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006, China
4. Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
5. China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In order to the investigation of the absolute measurements for α and β surface emission rates due to the working gas pressure variations in China NIM by using α and β multi-wire proportional counter. The surface emission rates measurement of plane sources 241Am、204Tl and 90Sr/90Y is measured respectively by changing working gas pressure in multi-wire proportional counter. The counting rate loss of small pules is corrected by the threshold extrapolation method. The results show that by taking in to account the counting loss of small pules, there is no significant difference observed and all of the measured emission rates are consistent in the range of the evaluated uncertainty within the range of 50 kPa to 180 kPa atmosphere. Monte Carlo simulations based on Geant4 code were also carried out to support our results. The results obtained by the Monte Carlo method are in agreement with the experimental results.
|
|
Received: 20 September 2017
Published: 07 January 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
［1］Sullivan P,Ghushchyan V H, Slejko J F. Methods for primary standardization of activity［J］. Metrologia,2007,44:S17-S26.
［2］李泽西, 贺海江, 梁珺成,等. 2pα、2pβ粒子发射率现场校准装置的建立［J］.计量学报, 2017, 38(1):117-122.
Li Z X,He H J,Liang J C, et al. The Establishment of the On-site Calibration Device for 2pα and 2pβ Particle Emission Rate Measurement［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2017, 38(1):117-122.
［3］Yunoki A, Hino Y. APMP comparison of measurement of surface emission rate of 36Cl large area source (APMP.RI(II)-K2.Cl-36)［J］. Applied Radiation & Isotopes, 2012, 70(9):1831-1835.
［4］Hutchinson J M R, Bright S J. The NBS large-area alpha particle counting systems［J］.Res Natl Bur Stand, 1987,92(5): 311-323.
［5］King L E, Hutchinson J M R,Unterweger M P. A new large-area 2 p, proportional counting system at NIST［J］. Applied Radiation & Isotopes, 2008, 66(6-7):877-880.
［6］Wuu J L,Yuan M C,Su S H, et al. The alpha and beta emitter measurement system in INER Institute of Nuclear Energy Research［J］. Applied Radiation & Isotopes Including Data Instrumentation & Methods for Use in Agriculture Industry & Medicine,
2002, 56(1):261-264.
［7］李奇,常永福,解峰,等.内充气正比计数管系统绝对测量87Kr放射性活度浓度［J］.原子能科学技术, 2006, 40(4):443-446.
Li Q, Chang Y F,Xie F, et al. Absolute Measurement of Activity Concentration of 87Kr by Using Internal Gas Proportional Counting［J］.Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2006, 40(4):443-446.
［8］骆志平, 庞洪超,刘阳,等.大面积气体闪烁正比计数器的研制及性能测试［J］.原子能科学技术, 2016, 50(10):1871-1874.
Luo Z P,Pang H C,Liu Y, et al . Development and performance testing of large surface gas scintillation proportional counter［J］. Atomic Energy Science and Technology,2016, 50(10):1871-1874.
［9］ Liang J C,Li Q,Liu J C, et al. The absolute measurement of 2pα and 2pβ particle emission rate［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica,2016,37(2):209-213.
［10］Tu Z,Song K Z,Zhang M,et al.A new digital pulse processing method for 2pα and 2pβ emitter measurement［J］. Nucl Sci Technol, 2016, 27(6):137-143.
［11］Kumar M, Gandhi S S, Nuwad J, et al. An electrochemical pathway to prepare circular planar 90 Sr/ 90 Y sources for the calibration of surface contamination monitors［J］. Journal of Radioanalytical & Nuclear Chemistry, 2014, 302(1):709-719.
［12］Unterweger M P, Felice P De. Uncertainties in surface emission rate measurements［J］. Metrologia,2015,52(3):S165-S171.
［13］吴治华.原子核物理实验方法［M］.北京:原子能出版社, 1981. |
|
|
|
2019, Vol. 40 
