新国际单位制对电磁计量体系的影响

邵海明; 张江涛; 黄璐

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2024.02.01

PDF(523 KB)

计量学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2) : 145-149. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2024.02.01

计量学总论

新国际单位制对电磁计量体系的影响

邵海明^1,2,张江涛¹,黄璐¹

作者信息 +

The Impact of the Electromagnetic Metrology System after the New International System of Units

SHAO Haiming^1,2,ZHANG Jiangtao¹,HUANG Lu¹

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

从2019年5月起, 以4个基本物理常数为基础的新国际单位制正式实施, 全面实现了用基本物理常数定义基本单位、基本单位的量子化以及量子基准取代实物基准, 开启了计量单位独立复现、不再依赖于国际计量局的全新局面。论述了新SI体系下电学计量体系相比于1990电学计量体系的变化, 探讨了国际单位制变革所引发的电磁测量活动。

Abstract

Since May 2019, the new international system of units (SI) based on the four fundamental physical constants has been formally implemented. The quantization of the basic units and the replacement of the artifact standards by the quantum standards open a new area, which can independently reproduce the fundamental SI units without the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). The major variations of the electrical units between the new SI and the original system in 1990 are mainly introduced. In the meantime, the changes for the electromagnetic measurement activities are also presented.

导出引用

邵海明,张江涛,黄璐. 新国际单位制对电磁计量体系的影响[J]. 计量学报. 2024, 45(2): 145-149 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2024.02.01

SHAO Haiming,ZHANG Jiangtao,HUANG Lu. The Impact of the Electromagnetic Metrology System after the New International System of Units[J]. Acta Metrologica Sinica. 2024, 45(2): 145-149 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2024.02.01

中图分类号： TB97 TB91

参考文献

［1］Resolution 1, the 26th General Conference on Weights and Measures［R/OL］.https://www.Bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/CGPM-2018/26th-CGPM-Resolutions.pdf.
［2］马爱文, 曲兴华. SI基本单位量子化重新定义及其意义［J］. 计量学报, 2020, 41(2): 129-133.
MA A W, QU X H. The Quantized Redefinition of the SI and its Signification［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2020, 41(2): 129-133.
［3］刘民, 彭明. 基本电荷量常数定值综述［J］. 计量学报, 2020, 41(3): 322-327.
LIU M, PENG M. Review Determination of the Elementary Charge e［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2020, 41(3): 322-327.
［4］刘民, 孙毅. 国际单位制的基本常数综述［J］. 电子测量与仪器学报, 2021, 35(1): 1-9.
LIU M, SUN Y. Review of elementary constants in international system of units［J］. Journal of Electronic Measurement and Instrumentation, 2021, 35(1): 1-9.
［5］JECKELMANN B, JEANNERET B. The quantum Hall effect as an electrical resistance standard［J］. Reports on Progress in Physics, 2001, 64(12): 1603-1655.
［6］HAMILTON C A. Josephson voltage standards［J］. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2000, 71(10): 3611-3623.
［7］TAYLOR B N,WITT T J. New international electrical reference standards based on the Josephson and quantum Hall effects［J］. Metrologia, 1989, 26(1): 47-62.
［8］贺青, 邵海明, 梁成斌. 电磁计量学研究进展评述［J］. 计量学报, 2021, 42(11): 1543-1552.
HE Q, SHAO H M, LIANG C B. Review on the Research Progress of Electromagnetic Metrology［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2021, 42(11): 1543-1552.
［9］李世松, 赵伟, 黄松龄,等. 国际单位制变革与电磁测量发展互促共赢［J］. 中国电机工程学报. 2021, 41(S1): 261-274.
LI S S, ZHAO W, HUANG S L, et al. Electrical Measurements and Revision of International System of Units: A Win-win Outcome［J］. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2021, 41(S1): 261-274.
［10］LI S S. From μ0 to e: A survey of major impacts for electrical measurements in recent SI revision［J］. IEEE Trans Instrum & Meas, 2020, 69(9): 5956-5965.
［11］GIBLIN S P, KATAOKA M, FLETCHER J D, et al. Towards a quantum representation of the ampere using single electron pumps［J］. Nature Communications, 2012, 3(1): 930.
［12］SCHERER H, CAMAROTA B.Quantum metrology triangle experiments: a status review［J］. Measurement Science and Technology, 2012, 23(12): 124010.
［13］THOMPSONh A M, LAMPARD D G. A new theorem in electrostatics and its application to calculable standards of capacitance［J］. Nature, 1956, 177(4515): 888.
［14］SMALL G W, FIANDER J R. Design of a calculable cross-capacitor［C］//2004 Conference on Precision Electromagnetic Measurements Digest. London, UK, 2004.
［15］JEFFERY A, LEE L H, SHIELDS J Q. Model tests to investigate the effects of geometrical imperfections on the NIST calculable capacitor［J］. IEEE Trans. Instrum & Meas., 1999, 48(2): 356-359.
［16］HUANG L, YANG Y, LU Z L, et al. Practical application of latest optimal hollow active auxiliary electrode in vertical calculable cross-capacitor at NIM［J］. IEEE Trans Instrum & Meas., 2019, 68(6): 2144-2150.
［17］KELLER M W, EICHEBBERGER A L, MARTINIS J M, et al. A capacitance standard based on counting electrons［J］. Science, 1999, 285(5434): 1706-1709.
［18］SCHERER H, SCHURR J, AHLERS F J. Electron counting capacitance standard and quantum metrology triangle experiments at PTB［J］. Metrologia, 2017, 54(3): 322-338.