Abstract：The National Institute of Metrology, as pilot laboratory for the first international key comparison for shock acceleration(CCAUV.V-K4) is proposed. Technical protocol is illustrated by combination of dynamic characteristics of shock acceleration measuring chain and spectral contents of shock excitation. Three different approaches are used to calculate the reference value of comparison, including recommended method by international comparison and two methods based on Bayesian inference. It is argued that Bayesian approach with different statistical model is compatible with the practice of metrology, with different prior distribution and MCMC method to obtain the posterior distribution. The equivalence and divergence of three methods are illustrated through comparison of results obtained.
胡红波,白杰,孙桥. 冲击加速度国际关键比对与参考值确定[J]. 计量学报, 2024, 45(1): 57-63.
HU Hongbo,BAI Jie,SUN Qiao. International Key Comparison of Shock Acceleration and Determination of the Reference Value. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2024, 45(1): 57-63.
COX M G. The evaluation of key comparison data ［J］. Metrologia, 2002, 39(3):589-595.
［1］
BIPM. Mutual Recognition of national measurements standards and of calibration and measurement certificates issued by national metrology institutes［R］. Bureau International des Poids at Mesures: Paris: 1999.
［3］
SUN Q, YANG L F, CLAIRE B, et al. Final report of CCAUV.V-K3: Key comparison in the field of acceleration on the complex charge sensitivity［J］. Metrologia, 2017, 54(1A), 09001.
SUN Q, WANG J L, HU H B, et al. Development of a low-g shock standard device based on rigid body collision for shock acceleration calibration［J］. Journal of vibration and shock, 2015,34(10):179-183.
［8］
SUN Q, HU H B, AKIHIRO OTA, et al. Key comparison in the field of acceleration on low intensity shock sensitivity［J］. Metrologia, 2019,56(1A),09003.
JIANG W S,YIN X,LI H Y,et al. Dynamic Calibration Method of a Force Transducer Based on Parameter Identification［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2021, 42(5): 603-608.
HU H B, SUN Q. Parameter identification of accelerometer based on primary shock calibration method［J］. Journal of test and measurement technology, 2013,27(1):19-24.
［14］
STEELE A G, HILL K D, DOUGLAS R J. Data pooling and key reference values［J］. Metrologia, 2002, 39(3):269-277.
［16］
TOMAN B. Bayesian approaches to calculating a reference value in key comparison experiments［J］. Technometrics, 2007, 49(1):81-87.
［18］
COULON R, JUDGE S. An evolutionary algorthim for consensus building in inter-laboratory comparisons［J］. Metrologia, 2021, 58 (6):1-11.
HU H B, SUN Q, HUANG Y Z. Comparing feasibility for primary method of shock calibration with different shock exciters［J］. Journal of vibration and shock, 2012, 31(20):27-31.
BAI J, HU H B. Estimates and Its Corresponding Uncertainty Evaluation of Parameters for Regression Model in Metrology［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2022, 43(12): 1683-1688.
HU H B, YANG L F, YU M. Study on key technologies of vibration calibration using Homodyne interferometer［J］. Acta Metrological Sinica, 2018, 39(3):368-372.
［19］
BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP and OIML, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. International Organization for Standardization, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement［S］. 2008.
YU M, HU H B, ZUO A B, et al. Establishment of new generation national primary standard device for shock acceleration calibration［J］. Journal of vibration and shock, 2013, 32(10):124-129.
2024, Vol. 45 
