交流功率标准构建原理及发展趋势综述

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2022.12.01

摘要
图/表
参考文献(22)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1233 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要交流功率标准作为电能计量最重要的溯源源头,对确保电能贸易结算的公平公正具有基础支撑作用。对目前构建高精度交流功率标准的常用方法以及功率量值溯源的链路进行了阐述。通过分析基于交流功率标准的电能表校准过程的误差来源,确立了主要的测量不确定度分量。针对现有交流功率标准存在的局限性,以及新型电力系统对电能计量提出的新需求,展望了电能计量标准未来的发展趋势。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	白静芬
	孟静
	赵东芳
	李世松
	段梅梅

关键词 ：计量学, 交流功率标准, 热电变换器, 可编程约瑟夫森电压标准, 脉冲驱动的约瑟夫森电压标准, 标准电能表

Abstract：As the core element for electrical energy traceability, AC power standards play a crucial role in ensuring fair and equitable electrical energy trade settlement. The methods commonly used to construct high-precision AC power standards and the related traceability paths are summarized. The major measurement uncertainty components during the calibration of the electric energy meters via different the AC power standards are analyzed. By reviewing the technical aspects in existing AC power standards and the new requirements of power system measurement, the future development trends for electric power and energy standards are prospected.

Key words： metrology AC power standard thermoelectric converter PJVS JAWS standard electricity meter

收稿日期: 2022-04-18 发布日期: 2022-12-28

PACS:

TB971

基金资助:国家电网有限公司总部科技项目(5700-202018170A-0-0-00)

作者简介: 白静芬(1982-),山西晋中人,中国电力科学研究院有限公司教授级高级工程师,从事电能计量技术研究。Email:jfbai@epri.sgcc.com.cn

引用本文:

白静芬,孟静,赵东芳,李世松,段梅梅. 交流功率标准构建原理及发展趋势综述[J]. 计量学报, 2022, 43(12): 1533-1537.
BAI Jing-fen,MENG Jing,ZHAO Dong-fang,LI Shi-song,DUAN Mei-mei. The Principle and Prospect of AC Power Standards. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2022, 43(12): 1533-1537.

链接本文:

http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2022.12.01 或 http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/CN/Y2022/V43/I12/1533

［1］Ramm G, Moser H,Braun A. A new scheme for generating and measuring active, reactive, and apparent power at power frequencies with uncertainties of 5 ppm［C］//1998 Conference on Precision Electromagnetic Measurements Digest (Cat. No.98CH36254). Washington D.C., USA, 1998.
［2］Ramm G, Moser H, Braun A. A new scheme for generating and measuring active, reactive, and apparent power at power frequencies with uncertainties of 2.5×10-6［J］. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 1999, 48 (2): 422-426.
［3］Shapiro E Z, Park Y T, Budovsky N, et al. A new power transfer standard, its investigation and intercomparison［J］. IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement, 1997, 46 (2): 412-415.
［4］Budovsky I. Standard of Electrical Power at Frequencies Up to 200 kHz［J］. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2009, 58 (4): 1010-1016.
［5］Poirier W, Lafont F, Djordjevic S, et al. A programmable quantum current standard from the Josephson and the quantum Hall effects［J］. Journal of Applied Physics, 2014, 115 (4): 1-6.
［6］Waltrip B C, Nelson T L, Berilla M, et al. Comparison of AC power referenced to either PJVS or JAWS［C］//IEEE. 2020 Conference on Precision Electromagnetic Measurements (CPEM).Denver, CO, USA, 2020.
［7］Waltrip B C, Gong B, Nelson T L, et al. AC power standard using a programmable Josephson voltage standard［C］//2008 Conference on Precision Electromagnetic Measurements Digest. Broomfield, CO, USA, 2008.
［8］Wang L, Jia Z, Liu Z, et al. Precision AC Power Measurement Based on Differential Sampling System Using ACPJVS［C］//World Congress of the International Measurement Confederation (IMEKO 2018).2018.
［9］Djokic B. Development of a low-frequency quantum-based ac power standard at NRC Canada［C］//2008 Conference on Precision Electromagnetic Measurements Digest.Broomfield, CO, USA, 2008.
［10］Burroughs C J, Dresselhaus P D, Rufenacht A, et al. NIST 10 V Programmable Josephson Voltage Standard System［J］. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2011, 60 (7): 2482-2488.
［11］贾正森, 王磊, 徐熙彤, 等.基于约瑟夫森量子电压的交流功率测量系统及方法研究［J］. 计量学报,2020, 41(4): 469-474.
Jia Z S, Wang L, Xu X T, et al. Research on AC Power Measurement System and Method Based on Josephson Quantum Voltage［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2020, 41 (4): 469-474.
［12］周琨荔. 脉冲驱动的交流约瑟夫森电压标准研究［D］. 北京: 清华大学, 2017.
［13］张鹏. 薄膜热电变换器热电转换误差测试系统研制［D］. 杭州: 中国计量大学, 2016.
［14］Han J, Huang R, Zhang P, et al. A Novel Film Thermal Converter Based on an Electrothermally Excited/Piezoresistively Detected Microbridge Resonator［J］. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2018, 67 (12): 2854-2862.
［15］周琨荔, 屈继峰, 张钟华, 等. 交流量子电压标准研究综述［J］. 计量学报, 2017, 38 (4): 486-491.
Zhou K L, Qu J F, Zhang Z H, et al. The Status of AC Quantum Voltage Standards［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2017, 38 (4): 486-491.
［16］Ihlenfeld W G K, Mohns E, Dauke K. Classical Nonquantum AC Power Measurements With Uncertainties Approaching 1μW/VA［J］. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2007, 56 (2): 410-413.
［17］Palafox L, Behr R, Ihlenfeld W G K, et al. The Josephson-effect-based primary AC power standard at the PTB: Progress report［J］. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2008, 58 (4): 1049-1053.
［18］徐熙彤, 贾正森, 王磊, 等. 基于约瑟夫森量子电压的谐波电压测量方法研究［J］. 计量学报,2020,41 (3): 311-316.
Xu X T, Jia Z S, Wang L, et al. Research on Harmonic Voltage Measurement Method Based on Josephson Quantum Voltage［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2020, 41 (3): 311-316.
［19］Chen S F, Amagai Y, Maruyama M, et al. Uncertainty evaluation of a 10 V rms sampling measurement system using the AC programmable Josephson voltage standard［J］. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2015, 64 (12): 3308-3314.
［20］贺青,邵海明,梁成斌. 电磁计量学研究进展评述［J］. 计量学报, 2021, 42(11): 1543-1552.
He Q, Shao H M, Liang C B. Review on the Research Progress of Electromagnetic Metrology［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2021, 42(11): 1543-1552.
［21］Li S, Wang Q, Zhao W, et al. From μ0 to e: A Survey of Major Impacts for Electrical Measurements in Recent SI Revision［J］. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2020, 69 (9): 5956-5965.
［22］李世松, 赵伟, 黄松岭, 等. 国际单位制变革与电磁测量发展互促共赢［J］. 中国电机工程学报, 2021,41 (S1): 261-274.
Li S S, Zhao W, Huang S L, et al. Electrical Measurements and Revision of International System of Units: A Win-win Outcome［J］. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2021, 41 (S1): 261-274.