海洋温度计量校准比对结果分析

高占科; 袁玲玲; 江帆

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2022.02.21

PDF(1466 KB)

计量学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2) : 268-273. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2022.02.21

热学计量

海洋温度计量校准比对结果分析

高占科,袁玲玲,江帆

作者信息 +

Analysis of Results about the Comparison of Marine Temperature Calibration

GAO Zhan-ke,YUAN Ling-ling,JIANG Fan

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

海洋测温仪是海洋调查、观测、监测业务中最重要的仪器设备,需要定期或在航前航后开展计量校准,确保测量结果准确可靠,消除漂移带来的系统误差。为了评价各国实验室间海洋测温仪计量校准结果的一致性,3个亚太区域国家的海洋计量校准实验室进行了海洋温度计量比对,开展3台海洋测温仪的计量校准比对试验,比对结果一致性良好,各参比实验室测量结果偏差均在可接受范围之内。

Abstract

Marine temperature measuring instrument is the most important instrument in marine survey, observation and monitoring business. It needs to carry out measurement calibration to ensure the accuracy and reliability of measurement results, eliminate the systematic error caused by drift. In order to evaluate the consistency of the calibration results of marine temperature measuring instrument among laboratories in different countries, the marine metrology and calibration laboratories of three countries in the Asia Pacific region have carried out the comparison of marine temperature calibration. The results of the comparison are consistent, and the deviation of the measurement results of each reference laboratory is within the acceptable range.

导出引用

高占科,袁玲玲,江帆. 海洋温度计量校准比对结果分析[J]. 计量学报. 2022, 43(2): 268-273 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2022.02.21

GAO Zhan-ke,YUAN Ling-ling,JIANG Fan. Analysis of Results about the Comparison of Marine Temperature Calibration[J]. Acta Metrologica Sinica. 2022, 43(2): 268-273 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2022.02.21

中图分类号： TB942

参考文献

［1］瞿咏梅. 国际90温标关键比对3的评述［J］. 计量学报, 2002, 23(1): 40-43.
Qu Y M. Comments on CCT Key Comparison of ITS-90 ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2002, 23(1): 40-43.
［2］陈毅,贾广慧,费腾, 等. 5Hz~10kHz频率范围矢量水听器校准国际主导比对［J］. 计量学报, 2020, 41(10): 1279-1283.
Chen Y, Jia G H, Fei T, et al. The Pilot Comparison Calibration of Vector Receivers in the Frequency Range 5Hz to 10kHz［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2020, 41(10): 1279-1283.
［3］刘波, 王崇愿, 朱鹏飞. 水流环境下温度传感器动态响应测量的不确定度评定［J］. 计量学报, 2020, 41(10): 1240-1244.
Liu B, Wang C Y, Zhu P F. Uncertainty Evaluation On Temperature Sensors Dynamic Response Based on Water Facility［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2020, 41(10): 1240-1244.
［4］代彩红, 王彦飞, 吴志峰, 等. 光谱辐射亮度国际比对与结果分析［J］. 计量学报, 2020, 41(2): 147-152.
Dai C H, Wang Y F, Wu Z F, et al. International Comparison and Result Analysis of Spectral Radiance［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2020, 41(2): 147-152.
［5］张宁, 沈少熙. 正多面棱体国际关键比对［J］. 计量学报, 2008, 29(z1): 143-146.
Zhang N, Shen S X. International Key Comparison of Regular Polyhedron［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2008, 29(z1): 143-146.
［6］闫小克, 段宇宁, 马重芳. 4种不同水源的水三相点容器的比对［J］. 计量学报, 2007, 28(2): 133-136.
Yan X K, Duan Y N, Ma C F. Comparison of Tripe point of Water Cells with Four Different Water Sources ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2007, 28(2): 133-136.
［7］张辉, 龚晓明,张亚楠. 中子源强度基准装置［J］. 计量学报, 2021, 42(10): 1380-1385.
Zhang H, Gong X M, Zhang Y N. The Primary Standard of Neutron Source Strength［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2021, 42(10): 1380-1385.
［8］高占科, 于惠莉, 田锐. 多项式回归校准结果的不确定度评定［J］. 海洋技术, 2010, 29(4): 130-132.
Gao Z K, Yu H L, Tian R. Evaluation of Uncertainty in Calibration Results of Polynomial Regression［J］. Ocean Technology, 2010, 29(4) : 130-132.
［9］胡波. 温盐深测量仪实验室校准方法［J］. 计量学报, 2011, 32(z1): 77-81.
Hu B. The Calibration Methods of CTD in Laboratory ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2011, 32(z1): 77-81.
［10］JJG 763-2019 温盐深测量仪［S］.
［11］JJF 1117-2010 计量比对［S］.
［12］吕彪, 郝小鹏, 孙建平, 等. 水体剖面温度测量仪的研制［J］. 计量学报, 2019, 40(3): 440-446.
Lü B, Hao X P, Sun J P, et al. Development of a Water Profile Temperature Measuring Instrument［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2019, 40(3): 440-446.
［13］Raiteri G, Bordone A, Ciu T. Uncertainty evaluation of CTD measurements : a metrological approach to water-column coastal parameters in the Gulf of La Spezia area ［J］. Measurement, 2018, 126(5), 156-163.
［14］Venkatesan R, Ramesh K, Muthiah M. Analysis of drift characteristic in conductivity and temperature sensors used in Moored buoy system ［J］. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 171: 151-156.
［15］Hosoda S, Hirano M, Hashimukai T. New method of temperature and conductivity sensor calibration with improved efficiency for screening SBE41 CTD on Argo floats［J］. Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, 2019, 6: 65.
［16］Hiroshi U, Ohyama K, Ozawa S, et al. In Situ Calibration of the SeaBird 9 plus CTD Thermometer ［J］. American Meteorological Society, 2007, 11: 1961-1967.