1. College of Life Sciences, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310018, China
2. Technology Innovation Center of Mass Spectrometry for State Market Regulation, Center for Advanced Measurement Science, National Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029, China
Abstract：The quality inspection of meat and its products is an important guarantee for food safety. In the past few decades, nucleic acid detection technology, biosensor, spectroscopy detection technology, immunology detection technology and mass spectrometry technology have been used for meat adulteration, which can accurately and rapidly detect the composition and content of main meat and its products on the market. And the development and application of relevant reference materials will further improve the accuracy and reliability of these test methods. A comprehensive analysis and review of the main methods for meat adulteration analysis are conducted, and the advantages and disadvantages of these technologies in meat adulteration detection are summarized.At the same time, the development trend of adulteration detection of meat and its products is discussed and forecasted, in order to provide a certain reference value for the improvement and regulation of my country's meat market.
Boyac I H, Temiz H T, Uysal R S, et al. A novel method for discrimination of beef and horsemeat using Raman spectroscopy ［J］. Food Chemistry, 2014, 148: 37-41.
［2］
Premanandh J. Horse meat scandal-a wake-up call for regulatory authorities ［J］. Food Control, 2013, 34(2): 568-569.
Li J, Li J P, Wei Y X, et al. Application of family-specific primers in multiplex real-time PCR for meat categories screening ［J］. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2022, 109: 104418.
［10］
Wang N, Xing R R, Zhou M Y, et al. Application of DNA barcoding and metabarcoding for species identification in salmon products ［J］. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, 2021, 38(5): 754-768.
［13］
Cao W, Li Y, Chen X, et al. Species identification and quantification of silver pomfret using the droplet digital PCR assay ［J］. Food Chemistry, 2020, 302: 125331.
［25］
Gardner J W, Bartlett P N. A brief history of electronic noses ［J］. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 1994, 18(1-3): 210-211.
［11］
Xing R R, Hu R R, Han J X, et al. DNA barcoding and mini-barcoding in authenticating processed animal-derived food: A case study involving the Chinese market ［J］. Food Chemistry, 2020, 309: 1-7.
［15］
Temisak S, Thangsunan P, Boonnil J, et al. Accurate determination of meat mass fractions using DNA measurements for quantifying meat adulteration by digital PCR ［J］. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 2021, 56(12): 6345-6358.
［17］
Yan S, Lan H, Wu Z, et al. Cleavable molecular beacon-based loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for the detection of adulterated chicken in meat ［J］. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2022, 414(28): 8081-8091.
［20］
Chen X, Yu H, Ji Y, et al. Development and Application of a Visual Duck Meat Detection Strategy for Molecular Diagnosis of Duck-Derived Components ［J］. Foods, 2022, 11(13): 1895.
［21］
Lin L, Zheng Y, Huang H, et al. A visual method to detect meat adulteration by recombinase polymerase amplification combined with lateral flow dipstick ［J］. Food Chemistry, 2021, 354: 129526.
［23］
Ganopoulos I, Bazakos C, Madesis P, et al. Barcode DNA high-resolution melting (Bar-HRM) analysis as a novel close-tubed and accurate tool for olive oil forensic use ［J］. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2013, 93(9): 2281-2286.
Wang Q, Li L, Wang J Y, et al. Rapid detection of ningxia small-tailed han sheep meat adulterated with duck by electronic nose combined with GC-MS ［J］. Food Science, 2017, 38(20): 222-228.
［30］
Avian C, Leu J S, Prakosa S W, et al. An improved classification of pork adulteration in beef based on electronic nose using modified deep extreme learning with principal component analysis as feature learning ［J］. Food Analytical Methods, 2022, 15(11): 3020-3031.
Pereira P M C C, Vicente A F R B. Meat nutritional composition and nutritive role in the human diet ［J］. Meat Science, 2013, 93(3): 586-592.
［5］
Tan L L, Ahmed S A, Ng S K, et al. Rapid detection of porcine DNA in processed food samples using a streamlined DNA extraction method combined with the SYBR Green real-time PCR assay ［J］. Food Chemistry, 2020, 309: 125654.
Peng Y Y, Wu X, Tao X Q. Quantitative detection of meat adulteration by real-time fluorescent PCR ［J］. Food and Fermentation Industrie, 2019, 45(15): 279-287.
［8］
Joana S A, GracieteSantos, M. Beatriz P P O, et al. Quantitative detection of pork meat by EvaGreen real-time PCR to assess the authenticity of processed meat products ［J］. Food Control, 2017, 72: 61-65.
［9］
Sentandreu M á, Sentandreu E. Authenticity of meat products: Tools against fraud ［J］. Food Research International, 2014, 60: 19-29.
［12］
Pan Y, Qiu D, Chen J, et al. Combining a COI Mini-Barcode with Next-Generation Sequencing for Animal Origin Ingredients Identification in Processed Meat Product ［J］. Journal of Food Quality, 2020(9): 1-9.
［14］
Ren J, Deng T, Huang W, et al. A digital PCR method for identifying and quantifying adulteration of meat species in raw and processed food ［J］. PLoS One, 2017, 12(3): e0173567.
［16］
Cai S, Kong F, Xu S. Detection of porcine-derived ingredients from adulterated meat based on real-time loop-mediated isothermal amplification ［J］. Molecular and Cellular Probes, 2020, 53: 101609.
［18］
Wang D, Wang Y, Zhang M, et al. Ladder-shape melting temperature isothermal amplification of nucleic acids ［J］. Biotechniques, 2021, 71(1): 358-369.
［19］
Lobato I M, OSullivan C K. Recombinase polymerase amplification: Basics, applications and recent advances ［J］. Trac Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2018, 98: 19-35.
［22］
Lopez-oceja A, Nuez C, Baeta M, et al. Species identification in meat products: a new screening method based on high resolution melting analysis of cytb gene ［J］. Food Chemistry, 2017, 237: 701-706.
［24］
Dobrovolny S, Blaschitz M, Weinmaier T, et al. Development of a DNA metabarcoding method for the identification of fifteen mammalian and six poultry species in food ［J］. Food Chemistry, 2019, 272: 354-361.
［26］
Tian X, Wang J, Ma Z, et al. Combination of an E-nose and an E-tongue for adulteration detection of minced mutton mixed with pork ［J］. Journal of Food Quality, 2019, 2019: 1-10.
Zhou X L, Liu Q, Zha E H. The application of electronic nose in adulterated minced beef identification ［J］. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2017, 38(4): 73-76.
Wang Z N, Zheng L M, Fang X W, et al. Pork freshness detection using optimized electronic nose sensor array ［J］. Meat Research, 2015, 29(5): 27-30.
［31］
Khalil I, Hashem A, Nath A R, et al. DNA/Nano based advanced genetic detection tools for authentication of species: Strategies, prospects and limitations ［J］. Molecular and Cellular Probes, 2021, 59: 101758.
［33］
Chen Y, Wang Y, Xiao M, et al. Polymerase chain reaction with lateral flow sensor assay for the identification of horse meat in raw and processed meat products ［J］. Food Chemistry, 2021, 345: 128840.
［35］
Zareef M, Chen Q, HASSAN M M, et al. An overview on the applications of typical non-linear algorithms coupled with NIR spectroscopy in food analysis ［J］. Food Engineering Reviews, 2020, 12(2): 173-190.
Bai J, Li J P, Zou H. Quantitative detection of pork in adulterated mutton rolls based on near infrared spectroscopy ［J］. Food Science, 2019, 40(2): 287-292.
［39］
Tuo L, Feng L, Luo A X, et al. Quantitative detection of binary and ternary adulteration of minced beef meat with pork and duck meat by NIR combined with chemometrics ［J］. Food Control, 2020, 113: 107203.
［41］
Abu-ghoush M, Fasfous I, Al-degs Y, et al. Application of mid-infrared spectroscopy and PLS-Kernel calibration for quick detection of pork in higher value meat mixes ［J］. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 2017, 11(1): 337-346.
［44］
Pchelkina V A, Chernukha I M, Fedulova L V, et al. Raman spectroscopic techniques for meat analysis: A review ［J］. Theory and Practice of Meat Prrocressing, 2022, 7(2): 97-111.
Wen R X, Hu Y Y, Yu J. A review of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy and its application in food analysis ［J］. Food Science, 2019, 40(15): 293-299.
［46］
Sezer B, Bjelak A, Velioglu H M, et al. Identification of meat species in processed meat products by using protein based laser induced breakdown spectroscopy assay ［J］. Food Chemistry, 2022, 372: 131245.
［48］
Jia W, Ruth S V, Scollan N, et al. Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) for meat quality evaluation across the supply chain: Current and future trends ［J］. Current Research in Food Science, 2022, 5: 1017-1027.
［50］
Jiang H, Ru Y, Chen Q, et al. Near-infrared hyperspectral imaging for detection and visualization of offal adulteration in ground pork ［J］. Pectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 2020, 249: 119307.
［32］
Wang W, Zhu Y, Chen Y, et al. Rapid visual detection of eight meat species using optical thin-film biosensor chips ［J］. Journal of AOAC International, 2015, 98(2): 410-414.
［40］
Al-jowder O, Kemsley E K, Wilson R H. Detection of adulteration in cooked meat products by mid-infrared spectroscopy ［J］. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2002, 50(6): 1325-1329.
［42］
Ramachandran K, Daoudi K, Kacem H H, et al. Rapid and ultra-sensitive detection of pork DNA with surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy for onsite food quality inspection ［J］. Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research, 2022, 38: 100524.
［49］
Kamruzzaman M, Makino Y, Oshita S. Rapid and non-destructive detection of chicken adulteration in minced beef using visible near-infrared hyperspectral imaging and machine learning ［J］. Journal of Food Engineering, 2016, 170: 8-15.
Ji Y, Chen X Y, Ding L, et al. Research progress in identification methods of animal derived ingredients in meat and meat products ［J］. Current Biotechnology, 2020, 10(6): 711-716.
［52］
Ahmed M M E, Nazmy W, Noureen A. Development and evaluation of elisa kits based on proteomics technology for detection and semi-quantification of meat species adulteration ［J］. Journal of Scientific Research in Medical and Biological Sciences, 2022, 3(1): 17-28.
［53］
Mandli J, Fatimi I E L, Seddaoui N, et al. Enzyme immunoassay (ELISA/immunosensor) for a sensitive detection of pork adulteration in meat ［J］. Food Chemistry, 2018, 255: 380-389.
［55］
Stachniuk A, Sumara A, Montowska M, et al. Peptide markers for distinguishing guinea fowl meat from that of other species using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry ［J］. Food Chemistry, 2021, 345: 128810.
［57］
Sarah S A, Faradalila W N, Salwani m S, et al. LC-QTOF-MS identification of porcine-specific peptide in heat treated pork identifies candidate markers for meat species determination ［J］. Food Chemistry, 2016, 199: 157-164.
［58］
Zhang Y Y, Liu M Y, Wang S W, et al. Identification and quantification of fox meat in meat products by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry ［J］. Food Chemistry, 2020, 372: 131336.
［38］
Weng S Z, Guo B Q, Tang P P, et al. Rapid detection of adulteration of minced beef using Vis/NIR reflectance spectroscopy with multivariate methods ［J］. Pectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 2020, 230: 118005.
［47］
Casdo-gavalda M P, Dixit Y, Geulen D, et al. Quantification of copper content with laser induced breakdown spectroscopy as a potential indicator of offal adulteration in beef ［J］. Talanta, 2017, 169: 123-129.
［56］
Wang J, Xu L, Xu Z, et al. Liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry and rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry were used to develop a lamb authentication method: a preliminary study ［J］. Foods, 2020, 9(12): 1723.
［54］
Li Y C, Liu S Y, Meng F B, et al. Comparative review and the recent progress in detection technologies of meat product adulteration ［J］. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 2020, 19(4): 2256-2296.
2023, Vol. 44 
