光谱辐射亮度国际比对与结果分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2020.02.04

摘要
图/表
参考文献(13)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (881 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要基于高温黑体辐射源BB3500M,中国计量科学研究院(NIM)自主研制了第四代光谱辐射亮度国家基准装置,波长范围覆盖220~2550nm,以稳定的钨带灯作为传递标准,改善了测量不确定度。黑体辐射源的温度测量溯源至Pt-C和Re-C固定点黑体,在3021 K采用WC-C固定点黑体进行验证,NIM和全俄光学物理计量院(VNIIOFI)之间的测量偏差小于70 mK。采用新基准装置,NIM参加了光谱辐射亮度国际APMP-PR.S6比对。NIM研制了两套入射光学系统,成像倍率分别为0.58和1.00,立体角为0.006sr和0.008sr,采用两套系统复现光谱辐射亮度量值的差异小于±0.40%。APMP-PR.S6比对结果表明:在紫外、可见和近红外波长范围,NIM与参考值的平均相对偏差分别为0.59%、0.44%和0.34%。全部波长范围的平均相对偏差0.46%。在250nm、400nm、800nm、2500nm波长,光谱辐射亮度的测量标准不确定度分别为0.95%、0.50%、0.41%和0.80%。从而验证了第四代光谱辐射亮度国家基准装置的准确性和可靠性。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	代彩红
	王彦飞
	吴志峰
	李玲

关键词 ：计量学, 光谱辐射亮度, 国际比对, 高温黑体, 测量不确定度, 国家基准

Abstract：Based on BB3500M high temperature blackbody, the fourth-generation primary standard apparatus of spectral radiance was developed at National Institute of Metrology (NIM) in the spectral wavelength from 220nm to 2550nm.A group of stable tungsten strip lamps were used as the transfer standards.The temperature measurement of the high temperature blackbodies were traced to the Pt-C and Re-C fixed point blackbodies and checked against the WC-C fixed-point blackbody, and the consistency of the temperature realized by NIM and All Russian Research Institute for Optical and Physical Measurements (VNIIOFI) at 3021 K was better than 70mK.Spectral radiance was realized by two different entrance systems at NIM respectively, and the imaging ratio of the two system were 0.58 and 1.00, the solid angle were 0.006sr and 0.008sr.The relative deviation of spectral radiance was less than ±0.40% by using the two system at all wavelengths.With the new developed primary standard apparatus, NIM took part in the international comparison of spectral radiance APMP-PR.S6.The comparison result shows that the average relative deviation are 0.59%, 0.44% and 0.34% respectively in ultraviolet, visible and near infrared wavelength.The average relative deviation in the whole wavelength is 0.46%.The measurement standard uncertainty of spectral radiance of NIM are 0.95%, 0.50%, 0.41% and 0.80% at 250nm, 400nm, 800nm and 2500nm respectively.The comparison result verified the performance of NIMs new national standard apparatus of spectral radiance.

Key words： metrology spectral radiance international comparison high temperature blackbody temperature measurement measurement uncertainty national primary standard

收稿日期: 2018-08-28 发布日期: 2020-02-17

PACS:

TB96

基金资助:国家重点研发计划(2016YFF0200304)

作者简介: 代彩红(1974-), 女, 河南偃师人, 中国计量科学研究院研究员, 博士, 主要从事光谱辐射度计量、紫外辐射计量、光生物安全研究。Email: daicaihong@nim.ac.cn

引用本文:

代彩红,王彦飞,吴志峰,李玲. 光谱辐射亮度国际比对与结果分析[J]. 计量学报, 2020, 41(2): 147-152.
DAI Cai-hong,WANG Yan-fei,WU Zhi-feng,LI Ling. International Comparison and Result Analysis of Spectral Radiance. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2020, 41(2): 147-152.

链接本文:

http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2020.02.04 或 http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/CN/Y2020/V41/I2/147

［1］代彩红, 吴志峰, 欧阳慧泉,等. 第四代光谱辐射度和色温度国家基准装置的研制［J］. 计量学报, 2013, 34(3): 201-206.
Dai C H, Wu Z F, Ouyang H Q, et al. Development of the Fourth-generation National Primary Standard Apparatus of Spectral Radiometry and Color Temperature［J］. Acta Metrologia Sinica, 2013, 34(3): 201-206.
［2］代彩红, 吴志峰, 王彦飞,等. NIM和VNIIOFI光谱辐射照度双边比对［J］. 计量学报, 2016, 37(4): 347-351.
Dai C H, Wu Z F, Wang Y F, et al. Bilateral Comparison of Spectral Irradiance between NIM and VNIIOFI［J］. Acta Metrologia Sinica, 2016, 37(4): 347-351.
［3］Dai C H, Wu Z F, Yu J L. Realization of the new national primary scale of spectral radiance and spectral irradiance［C］//SPIE.8910: 89100D-1-8, International Symposium on Photoelectronic Detection and Imaging 2013, Beijing, China, 2013.
［4］Dai C H, Wu Z F, Wang Y F, et al. Uncertainty analysis of spectral radiance scale realization［C］ //SPIE.10462: 1046246-1-9, Optical Sensing and Imaging Technology and Applications 2017. Beijing, China, 2017.
［5］Wu Z F, Dai C H, Yu J L, et al. Investigation of Blackbody 3500M ［C］ // SPIE. 8192: 819250-1-11, International Symposium on Phtoelectronic Detection and Imaging (ISPDI) 2011, Beijing, China, 2011.
［6］Saunders R D, Gibson C E, Mielenz K D., et al, Results of a NIST/VNIIOFI comparison of spectral-radiance measurements［J］. Metrologia, 1995/96, 32: 449-453.
［7］Khlevnoy B B, Sapritsky V S, Rougie B, et al. CCPR-S1Supplementary comparis- on for spectral radiance in the range of 220nm to 2500nm ［J］. Metrologia, 2009, 46(4): S174-S180.
［8］Shin D J, Park S C, Lee D H, et al. APMP. PR-S6 Supplementary Comparison of Spectral Radiance in the range from 250nm to 2500nm ［C］ // NewRad, Tokyo, Japan, 2017.
［9］Wu Z F, Dai C H, Yu J L, et al. Realization of the 250nm-400nm spectral irradiance scale ［C］ // SPIE.8201: 82012 B-1-8, International Conference on Optical Instruments and Technology: Optoelectronic Measurement Technology and Systems (OIT2011), Beijing, China, 2011.
［10］Ouyang H Q, Dai C H, Huang B, et al. Bandwidth determination of a Czerny-Turner double monochromator with varied slit widths through experiment and data computation［C］//SPIE.8197: 81971B-1-9, International Conference on Optical Instruments and Technology: Optical Systems and Modern Optoelectronic Instruments 2011. Beijing, China, 2011.
［11］Woolliams E R, Harrison N J, Fox N P. Preliminary results of the investigation of a 3500K black body［J］. Metrologia, 2000, 37(5): 501-504.
［12］Sperfeld P, Metzdorf J, Harrison N J, et al. Investigation of high-temperature black body BB3200［J］. Metrologia, 1998, 35(4): 419-422.
［13］Wu Z F, Dai C H, Huang B, et al. The imaging optical setup in the spectral radiance facility ［J］. Advanced Materials Research. 2012, 571: 406-410.