2025年04月07日 星期一 首页   |    期刊介绍   |    编 委 会   |    投稿指南   |    期刊订阅   |    统合信息   |    联系我们
计量学报  2017, Vol. 38 Issue (2): 252-256    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2017.02.28
  计量学总论、不确定度 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
基于证据理论的测量不确定度评定与分析
余学锋,于杰,王柯,张开维
中国人民解放军63870部队, 陕西 华阴 714200
Evaluating and Analyzing Measurement Uncertainty Based on the Theory of Evidence
YU Xue-feng,YU Jie,WANG Ke,ZHANG Kai-wei
Unit 63870, PLA, Huayin, Shaanxi 714200, China
全文: PDF (765 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 针对GUM推荐的基于概率统计理论的不确定度表达方法存在的局限性,提出了一种更为通用的基于证据理论的随机模糊变量(RFV)方法,实现对测量结果及其不确定度的评定。根据有效测量信息构建了RFV隶属函数以及相应的数学理论框架,通过简单的例子给出了如何运用RFV进行不确定度评定的流程。实验结果表明,该方法既可以提供测量结果的置信区间也可以给出不确定度分量的贡献程度。通过与GUM方法的比较,当存在不可忽略的非随机分量影响时,该方法比概率统计方法能更客观地描述测量结果离散程度。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
余学锋
于杰
王柯
张开维
关键词 计量学证据理论测量不确定度随机模糊变量评估    
Abstract:Deal with the limitations of GUM recommendations to express the measurement uncertainty based on a probabilistic and statistical theory, a more general approach which framed within the theory of the evidence was proposed. The method can represent the measurement result and its associated uncertainty in terms of random-fuzzy variables. An exhaustive mathematical framework and RFV membership functions was established according to the available information. The procedure for expressing the measurement uncertainty in terms of RFV was given by simple examples. The experimental results reported show that RFV are capable of both providing all the intervals of confidence and representing the different contributions to uncertainty. By compared with the approach of the GUM, the RFV method allows representing the dispersion of the values that could reasonably be attributed to the measured in a more suitable way than the probability theory, especially when no negligible nonrandom effects are present.
Key wordsmetrology    theory of evidence    measurement uncertainty    random fuzzy variables    evaluation
收稿日期: 2015-11-22      发布日期: 2017-02-28
PACS:  TB9  
通讯作者: 余学锋     E-mail: yxfyd@163.com
作者简介: 余学锋(1963-),男,江苏南京人,中国人民解放军63870部队高级工程师,主要从事仪器仪表与计量测试。yxfyd@163.com
引用本文:   
余学锋,于杰,王柯,张开维. 基于证据理论的测量不确定度评定与分析[J]. 计量学报, 2017, 38(2): 252-256.
YU Xue-feng,YU Jie,WANG Ke,ZHANG Kai-wei. Evaluating and Analyzing Measurement Uncertainty Based on the Theory of Evidence. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2017, 38(2): 252-256.
链接本文:  
http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2017.02.28     或     http://jlxb.china-csm.org:81/Jwk_jlxb/CN/Y2017/V38/I2/252
京ICP备:14006989号-1
版权所有 © 《计量学报》编辑部
地址:北三环东路18号(北京1413信箱)  邮编:100029 电话:(010)64271480
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn