PDF(2732 KB)
PDF(2732 KB)
PDF(2732 KB)
基于64次序双轴旋转方案的捷联惯性导航系统
Strapdown Inertial Navigation System Based on 64‑position Dual‑axis Rotation Scheme
为抑制惯性导航系统误差随时间累积的影响,研究了一种改进的64次序双轴旋转调制方案,并分析了其误差补偿特性。探讨了惯性测量单元常值误差、标度因子误差和安装误差的调制机制。通过仿真实验和物理实验,对比16次序、32次序和64次序旋转方案的误差抑制效果。48 h仿真数据显示,与16次序方案相比,64次序方案的纬度误差和经度误差分别降低60.9%和66.2%,东向速度误差和北向速度误差分别降低64.7%和67.3%,横滚角误差、俯仰角误差和航向角误差分别降低68.3%、62.0%和61.4%。24 h实验结果进一步验证了该方案在经纬度误差、速度误差和姿态误差方面的优化效果,其中航向角误差较16次序方案降低24.0%,验证了该方案的有效性。
To mitigate the influence of the error accumulation of the inertial navigation system (INS) over time, an improved 64-position dual-axis rotation modulation scheme was studied, and its error compensation characteristics were analyzed. Based on the principle of rotation modulation, the modulation mechanism of the constant error, scale factor error and installation error of the inertial measurement unit (IMU) was discussed. Through simulation experiments and physical experiments, the error suppression effects of the 16-position, 32-position and 64-position rotation schemes were compared. The 48-hour simulation showed that compared with the 16-position scheme, the latitude error and longitude error of the 64-position scheme were reduced by 60.9% and 66.2%, respectively, the east velocity error and north velocity error were reduced by 64.7% and 67.3%, respectively, and the roll angle error, pitch angle error and yaw angle error were reduced by 68.3%, 62.0% and 61.4%, respectively. The 24-hour experiment further verified the optimization effect of the scheme in terms of latitude and longitude errors, velocity errors and attitude errors, among which the yaw angle error was reduced by 24.0% compared with the 16-position scheme, verifying the effectiveness of the scheme.
速度与加速度计量 / 惯性导航系统 / 旋转调制方案 / 双轴旋转 / 误差补偿
velocity and acceleration measurement / inertial navigation system / rotation modulation scheme / dual-axis rotation / error compensation
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
查峰, 卜浩宇, 戴海发, 等.光学陀螺旋转调制惯导系统及关键技术发展[J].弹箭与制导学报, 2024, 44(5):25-37.
|
| [7] |
雷一非,谢波,李淑英.激光陀螺捷联惯导系统旋转调制技术综述[J].导航与控制, 2019, 18(6):10-20.
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
翁海娜,陆全聪,黄昆,等.旋转式光学陀螺捷联惯导系统的旋转方案设计[J].中国惯性技术学报, 2009, 17(1):8-14.
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
高延滨, 管练武, 王庭军, 等. 单轴旋转式光纤捷联惯导系统定位精度分析[J]. 仪器仪表学报, 2014, 35(4):794-800.
|
| [16] |
黄垚, 薛梓, 乔丹. 光学陀螺测角仪计量性能测试[J].计量学报, 2017, 38(S1):61-64.
|
| [17] |
王福谦. 计及边缘效应的双差动电容式加速度传感器的输出特性[J]. 计量学报, 2025,46(5):709-715.
|
| [18] |
陈乐.压电加速度传感器电激励自校准方法研究[J]. 计量学报, 2024, 45(1):52-56.
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |