1. College of Metrology and Measurement Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310018, China
2. National Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029
3. Beijing Great Wall Measurement and Test Technology Research Institute, AVIC, Beijing 100095
Abstract：The calibration methods of particle displacement and cross-frame time during particle image velocimetry (PIV)measurement are studied. The geometric size standard of disc is designed for camera calibration, the proportional relationship between the image obtained by camera and the object is determined, and the particle displacement calibration is realized by comparing with the ruler under the same experimental condition. A traceable timer is used to calibrate the time interval of PIV synchronizer pulse signals at different speed points. The cross-frame time correction coefficient is the ratio of the actual value to the initial value. As the result the PIV calibration coefficient is determined by the particle displacement correction coefficient and the cross-frame time correction coefficient. The uncertainty of PIV calibration results based on the sub-parameter method is evaluated. The results indicate that: at the theoretical speed point of 100m/s, the maximum relative error is 0.08%, and the uncertainty of the relative error is 0.01%.
ADRIAN R J. Multi-point optical measurements of simultaneous vectors in unsteady flow-a review［J］. International journal of heat and fluid flow, 1986, 7(2): 127-145.
［2］
ADRIAN R J. Particle-Imaging Techniques for Experimental Fluid Mechanics［J］. Annual review of fluid mechanics, 1991, 23(1): 261-304.
［5］
SCHLATTER P, RL R. Assessment of direct numerical simulation data of turbulent boundary layers［J］. Journal of fluid mechanics, 2010, 659: 116-126.
DONG M Z,WANG Y, JIANG N T. An experimental method for evaluating the PIV measurement error and its application in optimizing PIV experiment parameters ［J］ Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2005,19(2): 79-83．
LIU B, CUI L S, LI X T, et al. Analysis of Influencing Factors on Measurement Accuracy of Particle Image Velocimetry Technology［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2021, 42(3): 346-351.
［12］
孙鹏. 相机标定方法的研究［D］. 大庆: 东北石油大学, 2016
FAN Y B, HUANG G P, YAO S Y, et al. Studu on the Techniques of Camera Calibration in the Trinocular Stereo Photogrammetry System［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2015, 36(2): 132-135.
YANG T N, ZOU S, WU Z Y, et al. Uncertainty Analysis of Velocity Measurement in Low Pressure Flow Field ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2019, 40(2): 278-284.
SONG M S, FANG X H. Distribution Assignment and Type B Uncertainty Evaluation with the Known Coverage Interval［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2009, 30(5): 485-488.
［3］
ADRIAN R J. Scattering particle characteristics and their effect on pulsed laser measurement of fluid flow: speckle velocimetry vs particle image velocimetry［J］. Applied Optics, 1984, 23(11): 1690-1691.
［6］
HASSAN N H , ZAWAWI M H , BAKRI A M M A, et al. A Review on Applications of Particle Image Velocimetry［J］. IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, 864(1): 12149.
YANG Y. Verification of Steel Ruler and Evaluation of Uncertainty of Measurement Results ［J］. Value Engineering, 2022, 41(30): 111-113.
LUAN J. Discussion on uncertainty evaluation method of measurement results of general counter verification［J］. Journal of Time and Frequency, 2022, 45(3): 229-237.
2024, Vol. 45 
