1. School of Computer Science, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan 450007, Chin;
2. School of Mechatronics Engineering, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan 450007, China
3. Key Laboratory of Optical Sensing and Testing Technology for Mechanical Industry, Zhengzhou, Henan 450007, China
Abstract：The evaluation methods of cones global angular sizes were promoted based on the roundness profile extraction strategy, and the evaluation models of the least square global angular size and the minimax global angular size of cone were built. Based on the established evaluation model, the flowchart of the moth-flame optimization algorithm for evaluation of cones global angular sizes were given. The least square and minimax global angular sizes of four cone simulated samples were evaluated by using the developed program, and their evaluation results and optimization characteristics values obtained based on different evaluation methods, different optimization initial values and different optimization algorithms were compared. The minimax global angular sizes of one sample were evaluated using crow search algorithm, artificial ecosystem-based optimization, equilibrium optimizer and particle swarm optimization, and their results were compared with those of MFO. In addition to the influence of optimization initial values, the evaluation results were influenced by the search interval, the population number and the maximum number of iterations, but their influence regularities were not strong. In general, the results evaluated by MFO are better than those evaluated by the other four optimization methods.
GAN J H, WANG J, XU M H. A Fast Minimum Circumscribed Circle Error Evaluation Method Based on Outer Enveloping Points ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2023, 44(5): 687-693.
［9］
YANG Y, LI M, WANG C, et al. Cylindricity Error Evaluation Based on an Improved Harmony Search Algorithm ［J］. Scientific Programming, 2018(2): 1-13.
［10］
LIU F, CAO Y L, LI T K, et al. An Iterative Minimum Zone Algorithm for assessing cylindricity deviation ［J］. Measurement, 2023, 213: 112738.
［1］
Geometrical product specifications (GPS)-Series of conical tapers and taper angles:ISO1119:1998 ［S］.
［8］
LIU W W, ZHOU X H, LI H L, et al. An algorithm for evaluating cylindricity according to the minimum condition ［J］. Measurement, 2020, 158: 107698.
WU T H, ZHAO Z X, WANG S F, et al. Cylindricity error evaluation based on seagull algorithm ［J］. Journal of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, 2023, 40(3): 422-428.
［13］
ASKARZADEH A. A novel metaheuristic method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems: Crow search algorithm ［J］. Computers & Structures, 2016, 169: 1-12.
［16］
ABUALIGAH L, DIABAT A, MIRJALILI S, et al. The Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm ［J］. Computer methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2021, 376: 113609.
［17］
MIRJALILI S. Moth-flame optimization algorithm: A novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm ［J］. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2015, 89: 228-249.
［19］
ZHAO Z X, REN D X, ZHAO X Y, et al. Study on the Extraction Simulation of the Cylindrical Features ［J］. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020(7): 1-20.
ZHAO Z X, WANG S F, ZHAO X Y. Study on the Measuring Method of Two-point Sizes for Revolving Body Based on the Roundness/Cylindricity Measuring Instrument ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2023, 44(6): 858-864.
KONG Y Q, WANG S Q, ZHU Y G. The evaluation of Roundness by Improved Zone Searching Algorithm ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2023, 2023, 44(7): 1033-1039.
［14］
ZHAO W, WANG L, ZHANG Z. Artificial ecosystem-based optimization: a novel nature-inspired meta-heuristic algorithm ［J］. Neural Computing and Applications, 2020, 32(13), 9383-9425.
DONG Z Y, XU X S, LI M Y, et al. Evaluation of Spatial Straightness Error Based on Differential Bee Colony Algorithm ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2023, 44(7): 1019-1026.
2024, Vol. 45 
