金相显微镜畸变的测量不确定度评定

余泽利; 房永强; 杨军红; 张兵; 张艺新; 郑铱; 毕革平

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2023.11.06

PDF(1589 KB)

计量学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (11) : 1673-1679. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2023.11.06

光学计量

金相显微镜畸变的测量不确定度评定

余泽利¹,房永强¹,杨军红^1,2,张兵¹,张艺新¹,郑铱¹,毕革平¹

作者信息 +

Evaluation of Uncertainty in Measurement of Etallographic Microscope Distortion

YU Ze-li¹,FANG Yong-qiang¹,YANG Jun-hong^1,2,ZHANG Bing¹,ZHANG Yi-xin¹,ZHENG Yi¹,BI Ge-ping¹

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

畸变能够反映金相显微镜实际像与理想像的偏差,是金相显微镜性能准确可靠的重要技术指标。依据《测量不确定度评定与表示》校准规范,对金相显微镜畸变测量过程进行了研究,建立畸变测量结果的不确定度评定数学模型,全面分析不确定度来源,评定金相显微镜畸变测量结果的不确定度。结果表明:取包含因子k=2,置信水平为95%时,在总放大倍率为50×、100×、200×、500×和1000×条件下,金相显微镜的相对畸变测量结果分别为(0.5±0.4)%、(0.3±0.6)%、(1.3±0.4)%、(0.4±0.4)%、(0.9±0.1)%,测量结果的不确定度主要来源于畸变测量系统和重复性测试。

Abstract

Distortion can reflect the deviation between the actual image and the ideal image of a metallographic microscope, and is an important technical indicator for accurate and reliable performance of metallographic microscopes. According to the calibration standard "Evaluation and Representation of Measurement Uncertainty", the distortion measurement process of the metallographic microscope was studied, the mathematical model for the uncertainty evaluation of the distortion measurement results was established, the sources of uncertainty were comprehensively analyzed, and the uncertainty of the distortion measurement results of the metallographic microscope was evaluated.The results show that when the coverage factor k=2, the confidence level is 95%, under the condition of the total magnifications is 50×, 100×, 200×, 500× and 1000×, the relative distortion measurement results of the metallographic microscope is (0.5±0.4)%, (0.3±0.6)%, (1.3±0.4)%, (0.4±0.4)%, (0.9±0.1)%, respectively. The uncertainty of the measurement results mainly comes from the distortion measurement system and repeatability test.

导出引用

余泽利,房永强,杨军红,张兵,张艺新,郑铱,毕革平. 金相显微镜畸变的测量不确定度评定[J]. 计量学报. 2023, 44(11): 1673-1679 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2023.11.06

YU Ze-li,FANG Yong-qiang,YANG Jun-hong,ZHANG Bing,ZHANG Yi-xin,ZHENG Yi,BI Ge-ping. Evaluation of Uncertainty in Measurement of Etallographic Microscope Distortion[J]. Acta Metrologica Sinica. 2023, 44(11): 1673-1679 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2023.11.06

中图分类号： TB96

参考文献

［1］蔡潇雨, 魏佳斯, 孙恺欣, 等. 白光干涉测量系统的测量不确定度评定［J］. 计量学报, 2021, 42(6): 731-737.
Cai X Y, Wei J S, Sun K X, et al. Evaluation of uncertainty inmeasurement withwhite-light interference system ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2021, 42 (6): 731-737.
［2］夏玉国,彭友志,刘正华,等. 线性回归拟合的测量不确定度评定［J］. 计量学报, 2023, 44(4): 664-670.
Xia Y G,Peng Y Z,Liu Z H,et al. The Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation of Linear Regression Fitting. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2023, 44(4): 664-670.
［3］叶德培. 测量不确定度理解评定与应用［M］. 北京: 中国质检出版社, 2013.
［4］陈凌峰. 标准不确定度A类评定中极差法的深入讨论［J］. 计量学报, 2019, 40(2): 347-352.
Chen L F. The Further Discussion of the Range Method in the Type AEvaluation of Sstandard Uncertainty ［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2019, 40(2): 347-352.
［5］董章. 适于固体生物大样本的光学显微成像方法初步研究［D］. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2011.
［6］崔洪州, 孔渊, 周起勃, 等. 基于畸变率的图像几何校正［J］. 应用光学, 2006, 27(3): 183-185.
Cui H Z, Kong Y, Zhou Q B, et al. Image geometric correction based on distortion rate ［J］. Applied Optics, 2006, 27 (3): 183-185.
［7］施韦特 D, 安胡特 T, 沃尔德 M, 等. 具有低畸变像差的显微镜［P］. 德国: CN107003506B, 2020-05-05.
［8］钱磊, 吴丹. 一种标定显微镜镜头畸变的方法［J］. 宁波大学学报, 2021, 34(3): 24-29.
Qian L, Wu D. A method for calibrating the distortion of microscope lens ［J］. Journal of Ningbo University, 2021, 34(3): 24-29.
［9］西安汉唐分析检测有限公司. 一种光学显微镜系统畸变测量方法［P］. CN113884283A,2022-01-04.
［10］JJF 1059.1-2012 测量不确定度评定与表示［S］.
［11］西安汉唐分析检测有限公司. 一种光学显微镜畸变测量用线纹尺［P］. CN215865750U,2022-02-18.
［12］西安汉唐分析检测有限公司. 一种光学显微镜用数码相机转接装置［P］.CN215642048U, 2022-01-25.
［13］JJG117-2013 平板检定规程［S］.
［14］JJG146-2011 量块检定规程［S］.
［15］JJG73-2005 高等别线纹尺检定规程［S］.
［16］吴伯群, 毕革平. 一种实现显微镜照相系统计算机化的方法［P］. CN1220403A, 1999-06-23.
［17］Bi G P. The measuring method for actual total magnification of metallographic microscope—digital image method ［J］. Materials Science and Engineering, 2018,(397): 961-972.