采样流量和孔板间距对浮游菌采样器采集效率的影响

田莹; 张国城; 刘佳琪; 吴丹; 沈上圯; 荆文杰

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2023.07.23

PDF(27115 KB)

计量学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (7) : 1154-1158. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2023.07.23

电离辐射、标准物质与生物计量

采样流量和孔板间距对浮游菌采样器采集效率的影响

田莹,张国城,刘佳琪,吴丹,沈上圯,荆文杰

作者信息 +

Effect of Sampling Flow Rate and Nozzle-plate Spacing on Collection Efficiency of Plankton Sampler

TIAN Ying,ZHANG Guo-cheng,LIU Jia-qi,WU Dan,SHEN Shang-yi,JING Wen-jie

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

浮游菌采样器作为一种高效的撞击采样器,具有易操作、小巧便携等特点,广泛应用于药厂洁净间、卫生防疫等场所。目前市场上的浮游菌采样器采集效率缺乏科学、高效的评价方法。采用基于空气动力学粒径谱仪的评价方法,分别检测2种国产浮游菌采样器的采集效率,发现采样流量、琼脂高度以及孔板间距（喷嘴到采集板距离）等因素会显著影响浮游菌采样器采集效率。研究表明,在固定采样流量下,孔板距离越近,采集效率越好;在孔板距离固定条件下,随着采样流量增大,采集效率会出现先增大后降低的特性,在采样流量为80L/min时的采集效率最好;琼脂厚度越大,采集效率越高。该研究对改进浮游菌采样器的结构设计、提高产品质量具有参考意义,有助于提高浮游菌采样器的检测准确性和科学性。

Abstract

As an efficient single-stage Anderson impact sampler, the plankton sampler is easy to operate, small and portable, which is widely used in clean rooms of pharmaceutical factories, sanitation and epidemic prevention. At present, the collection efficiency of plankton sampler in the market lacks scientific and efficient evaluation method. An evaluation method based on aerodynamic particle size spectrometer was used to test the collection efficiency of two kinds of domestic plankton samplers. It was found that sampling flow rate, the height of agar and the distance between nozzle and plate would significantly affect the collection efficiency of phytoplankton sampler. The results show that under a fixed sampling flow rate, the closer the petri dish is to the sampling head, the better the collection efficiency.When the distance between petri dish and sampling head is fixed, the collection efficiency increases first and then decreases with the increase of sampling flow rate, and the collection efficiency is the best when the sampling flow rate is 80L/min. The larger the agar thickness, the higher the sampling efficiency. The study has reference significance for improving the structure design of the plankton sampler, improving the product quality, and helping to improve the accuracy and scientificity of the detection of the plankton sampler.

导出引用

田莹,张国城,刘佳琪,吴丹,沈上圯,荆文杰. 采样流量和孔板间距对浮游菌采样器采集效率的影响[J]. 计量学报. 2023, 44(7): 1154-1158 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2023.07.23

TIAN Ying,ZHANG Guo-cheng,LIU Jia-qi,WU Dan,SHEN Shang-yi,JING Wen-jie. Effect of Sampling Flow Rate and Nozzle-plate Spacing on Collection Efficiency of Plankton Sampler[J]. Acta Metrologica Sinica. 2023, 44(7): 1154-1158 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2023.07.23

中图分类号： TB99

参考文献

［1］Douwes J, Thorne P, Pearce N, et al. Bioaerosol health effects and exposure assessment: progress and prospects［J］. The Annals of occupational hygiene, 2003, 47:187-200.
［2］Cox C S, Wathes C M. Bioaerosols Handbook［M］. CRC press, 1995:11-14.
［3］Alwis K U, Mandryk J, Hocking A D. Exposure to biohazards in wood dust: Bacteria, fungi, endotoxins, and (1→3)-beta-d-glucans［J］. Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 1999, 14(9): 598-608.
［4］Fung F, Hughson W G. Health effects of indoor fungal bioaerosol exposure［J］. Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2003, 18(7): 535-544.
［5］Robbins C A, Swenson L J, Nealley M L, et al. Health effects of mycotoxins in indoor air: A critical review［J］. Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2000, 15(10): 773-784.
［6］Lewis D. Superspreading drives the COVID pandemic-and could help to tame it［J］. Nature, 2021, 590: 544-546.
［7］Bulfone T C, Malekinejad M, Rutherford G W, et al. Outdoor transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses: a systematic review［J］. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2021, 223: 550-61.
［8］Van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris D H, et al. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1［J］. New Engl J Med,2020, 382(16): 1564-67.
［9］Wang C C, Prather K A, Sznitman J, et al.Airborne transmission of respiratory viruses［J］. Science, 2021, 373(6558): 1-12.
［10］张国城,杜亦楠. 浮游菌采样器计量检测中若干问题的讨论［J］,计量技术, 2017(6): 48-50.
Zhang G C, D Y N. Discussion about some problems of the measurement of planktonic bacteria sampler［J］. Metrology Science and Technology, 2017(6): 48-50.
［11］张国城.浮游菌采样器校准装置的校准［J］.计量技术, 2019(2): 40-42.
Zhang G C. Calibration of plankton sampler calibration device［J］. Metrology Science and Technology, 2019(2): 40-42.
［12］张国城,张庆暖,张婧. 浮游菌采样器原理及其量值溯源方法研究［J］. 计量技术, 2016(5): 46-49.
Zhang G C, Zhang Q N, Zhang J. Study on the principle and value tracing method of microbiologial air sampler［J］. Metrology Science and Technology, 2016(5):46-49.

［13］刘佳琪,张国城,吴丹,等. 基于空气动力学的浮游菌采样器采集物理效率检测方法的研究［J］.计量学报,2022, 43(9): 1216-1219.
Liu J Q, Zhang G C, Wu D, et al. Study on the Detection Method of Sampling Physical Efficiency of Planktonic Sampler Based on Aerodynamics［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2022, 43(9): 1216-1219.

［14］刘佳琪,张国城,吴丹,等. PM10切割器捕集效率评价装置及方法研究［J］. 环境科学学报, 2021, 41(6): 2340-2346.
Liu J Q, Zhang G C, Wu D, et al. Research on the efficiency evaluation device and method of PM10 cutter［J］. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2021, 41(6): 2340-2346.
［15］刘佳琪,张国城,赵晓宁,等. 进气流量对PM2.5切割器捕集效率的影响分析［J］.计量学报,2021,42(4):532-536.
Liu J Q, Zhang G C, Zhao X N, et al. Analysis of the Influence of Air Inlet Flow Rate on the Capture Efficiency of PM2.5 Cutter［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2021, 42(4):532-536.
［16］白志鹏,朱坦,郭光焕.冲击采样器设计参数分析［J］.环境污染治理技术与设备,2004(8):79-82.
Bai Z P, Zhu T, Guo G H. An analysis of design parameters of impactor for particulate sampling［J］. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2004(8): 79-82.
［17］Hinds W C. Aerosol Technology［M］. New York:John Wiley, 1982.
［18］Willeke K, Mcfeters J J. The influence of flow entry and collecting surface on the impaction efficiency of inertial impactors［J］. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 1975, 53(1): 121-127.
［19］Marple V A, Willeke K. Impactor design［J］. Atmospheric Environment, 1976, 10(10): 891-896.
［20］Wang H, Bhambri P, Ivey J, et al. Design and pharmaceutical applications of a low-flow-rate single-nozzle impactor［J］. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2017, 533(1): 14-25.
［21］Whyte W, Green G, Albisu A. Collection efficiency and design of microbial air samplers［J］. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2007, 38: 97-110.
［22］Zhen S, Li K, Yin L, et al. A comparison of the efficiencies of a portable BioStage impactor and a Reuter centrifugal sampler (RCS) High Flow for measuring airborne bacteria and fungi concentrations［J］. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2009, 40(6): 503-513.
［23］Stewart S L, Grinshpun S A, Willeke K, et al. Effect of impact stress on microbial recovery on an agar surface［J］. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1995, 61(4): 1232-1239.
［24］Yao M, Mainelis G. Analysis of portable impactor performance for enumeration of viable bioaerosols［J］. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2007, 4(7): 514-524.