针对声学多普勒流速剖面仪(ADCP)现场校准困难的问题,介绍了一种基于频偏应答的ADCP流速现场校准方法。通过声信号应答器,设置回发信号相对于发射信号的频偏实现速度矢量的模拟,并以频率为溯源量,对ADCP发射的信号及应答器回发频偏信号进行频率校准,进而实现ADCP流速参数的现场校准。研制了一套基于频偏应答的ADCP流速现场校准装置,在实验室消声水池条件下,以四波束300kHz ADCP为校准对象,开展了1～2m/s的流速校准实验,进行不确定度分析。结果表明,该装置对流速校准的不确定度达到1％模拟流速＋7mm/s,验证了该校准方法的可行性。
Abstract
With the regard to the difficulty in field calibration of Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP), a field calibration method of ADCP velocity based on frequency offset response is introduced. Through the acoustic signal transponder, the frequency offset of the back signal relative to the transmitted signal is set to simulate the velocity vector, in addition, frequency is taken as the traceability quantity to carry out frequency calibration on the signals emitted by ADCP and the offset signals sent back by the transponder, so as to realize the field calibration of the velocity parameters of ADCP. A field calibration device of ADCP velocity based on frequency offset response is developed. In the laboratory anechoic tank condition, four-beam 300kHz ADCP was used as the calibration object, carried out a velocity calibration experiment of 1 to 2m/s and performed uncertainty analysis. The results show that the uncertainty of the flow rate calibration is 1% simulated flow rate +7mm/s, which verifies the feasibility of the calibration method.
关键词
计量学 /
流速现场校准 /
声学多普勒流速剖面仪 /
频偏应答 /
不确定度
Key words
metrology /
flow rate field calibration /
acoustic doppler current profiler /
frequency offset response /
uncertainty
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
［1］刘彦祥. ADCP技术发展及其应用综述［J］. 海洋测绘, 2016, 36(2): 45-49.
Liu Y H. The Technology development and application research of ADCP［J］. Hydrographic Surveying and Charting, 2016, 36(2): 45-49.
［2］王槐军. ADCP技术在水文测验中的应用［J］. 能源与节能, 2017, (8): 165-166, 179.
Wang H J. Application of ADCP Technology in Hydrological Test［J］, Energy And Energy Conservation, 2017, (8): 165-166, 179.
［3］HY/T 102-2007 声学多普勒流速剖面仪检测方法［S］. 2007.
［4］GB/T 24558-2009 声学多普勒流速剖面仪［S］. 2009.
［5］李占桥, 田志光, 吴宝勤. 两种型号RDI ADCP测速精度分析［J］. 海洋测绘, 2012, 32(6): 57-59.
Li Z Q, Tian Z G, Wu B Q. Speed measurement accuracy analysis of two models of RDI ADCP［J］. Hydrographic Surveying And Charting, 2012, 32(6): 57-59.
［6］吴炳昭, 李占桥, 孙辉. ADCP比测试验的统计分析［J］. 海洋测绘, 2010, 30(6): 74-76.
Wu B Z, Li Z Q, Sun H. Statistical analysis of comparative tests of ADCP［J］. Hydrographic Surveying And Charting, 2010, 30(6): 74-76.
［7］姜松燕, 高伟, 骆工. 声学多普勒流速仪计量检定工作分析［J］. 水利信息化, 2010, (5): 54-56.
Jiang S Y, Gao W, Luo G. Analysis of metrological verification of Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler［J］. Water Resources Informatization, 2010, (5): 54-56.
［8］易志强, 赵知劲, 马修准, 等. 宽带声学多普勒流速剖面仪球面散射回波模型研究［J］. 计量学报, 2016, 37(6): 610-614.
Yi Z Q, Zhao Z J, Ma X Z, et al. Research on Sphercical Scattering Echo Model for Broadband Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler［J］. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2016, 37(6): 610-614.
［9］Ma L , Zhang X J , Deng K , et al. An acoustic simulation approach for testing ADCP［C］// IEEE, San Diego, USA, 2013.
［10］申连洋, 匡锐. ADCP陆上检测装置的设计与实现［J］. 应用科技, 2009, 36(8): 39-43.
Shen L Y, Kuang R. Design of ADCP land-measuring device［J］. Applied Science and Technology, 2009, 36, (8): 39-43.
［11］陶乐文. ADCP实验室检测系统［D］. 南京: 东南大学, 2017.
［12］刘德铸. 声学多普勒流速测量关键技术研究［D］. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2010.
［13］黄雄飞, 苑秉成, 陈喜, 等. 相控阵多普勒计程仪半实物仿真方法研究及其实现［J］. 武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版), 2011, 35(5): 1063-1066, 1071.
Huang X F, Yuan B C, Chen X, et al. Semi-physical simulation method of phased array doppler log and its realization［J］. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Transportation Science And Engineering) , 2011, 35(5): 1063-1066, 1071.
［14］马献果, 焦阳. 频率测量方法的改进［J］. 仪器仪表学报, 2010, (z1): 120-121.
Ma X G, Jiao Y. Improvement on Traditional Frequency Measurement Methods［J］. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2010, (z1): 120-121.
［15］黄雄飞, 周徐昌, 何建军. 声学多普勒海流剖面仪误差源分析［J］. 声学与电子工程, 2006, (4): 1-3.
Huang X F, Zhou X C, He J J. Error source analysis of Acoustic Doppler Current Velocity［J］. Acoustics and electronics engineering, 2006, (4): 1-3.
基金
国家重点研发计划(2017YFF0206403);国家自然科学基金青年基金(11904346)
PDF(1282 KB)
